roadrash
cycle chatterer
- Location
- sitting on the edge of wigan pier
I thought TGH was going to tell him to feck off, blatantly obvious hes absolutely spent and then a reporter shoves a mike under your nose and says ,how was it out there, ffs …...
Don't know,but that was his time for sure ! Feel for Trentin who you'd have thought,him aswell that he had that nailed.Confident enough to sprint from a bit too far out....age over experience took it though.Will he win another race next year?
We should have spotted his build-up this year though. The only race he's won in 2019 is the Iceberg Tour - ideal prep for Yorkshire
https://www.procyclingstats.com/race/gp-d-isbergues/2019
I was hoping the winner would be someone I'd snapped on the TT the other week. So Moscon would've been fine by me.For a while, until Moscon was dropped, I was considering the possibility that we could end up with a champion even more unpopular than Valverde.
What video are you thinking of? I've looked at three (Vuelta, GCN and Eurosport) and found nothing remotely similar to Eekhoff's 2+ minutes whizzing through town and country behind a lone team car not in the convoy.Going back to the Eekhoff DQ for a minute.
This kind of thing* is unsurprising given cycling's woolly application of rules about drafting - sometimes we allow it after a crash, sometimes we might allow it a bit. No, no - not that much!
Looking at the videos it did seem he was taking the P. But look at the video of stage 19 of the Vuelta and try to spot the difference.
I can't be precise about what video. Just some footage I saw of riders (including I think Lopez and possibly also Roglic I don't recall) sheltering behind the cars. That's the "questionable shuffling" you referred to.What video are you thinking of?
...
So in other words, the rules seem to have been followed correctly in both cases
Then please don't write "look at the video" if there is no video!I can't be precise about what video.
Having two levels of punishment for different severity of offence doesn't make it a "continuum". Is there any reasonable interpretation of "aggravating circumstances" which would either lead to disqualification also being applied for convoy-hopping when making the way back after a crash or not being applied for a 2+min high-speed lone-car pacing?I am suggesting that the continuum of application of these rules - including riders who blatantly draft a car until a watching official blows a whistle, and a blind eye being turned to questionable shuffling makes cases like this unsurprising.