Your industry has had more than long enough to come up with any number of solution to a problem for which it is responsible. How much longer do you need?
Tipper trucks are clearly a visible part of the construction industry spilling out onto the roads. As such they should be governed by the same health and safety regulations on the road as on site.
As for the how do we get the necessary deliveries bit, not my problem, other than the fact that the argument is used to force everyone to accept the problem on our roads. It should be down to the group with the vested interest to sort it.
TrueThis terrible story may not be proof for such a tough enforcement, but a tough enforcement is still needed.
A cyclists on the phone can be suicidal, a lorry driver on the phone can be homicidal. Only one of those needs resources and strict enforcement.
No we're not, well according to an eye witness we're not, or are you not interested in what actually happened & happy to live in your 'all tipper's are evil' world?No one has. We are talking about the disproportionate level of danger these vehicles and operating practice's bring to our roads.
All tippers aren't evil, nobody is suggesting that.happy to live in your 'all tipper's are evil' world?
How was this driver 'infringing' he was indicating left, he had an audible warning that he was turning left, he probably (yes I am hypothesising here) moved slightly right to be able to turn left, he probably (yes I am hypothesising here) slowed even further down, other cyclist say what was happening & held back, yet this unfortunate soul missed all the warning & continued onAll tippers aren't evil, nobody is suggesting that.
All tippers have the potential to kill numerous people and thus all tippers should be driven with utmost care and utmost responsibility with the heaviest punishment for infringements.
I have & all you do is bleat on about how's it's everybody's elses other than the never making a mistake downtrodden cyclist fault no matter what the circumstances are,Go back and read the thread. We are discussing the disproportionate level of danger these vehicles bring to our roads. Using emotive words like evil in this context is just being silly.
He (?) did nothing wrong. If the case, he will face no charges. The lawlessness amongst his colleagues is frightening and must be addressed.How was this driver 'infringing' he was indicating left, he had an audible warning that he was turning left, he probably (yes I am hypothesising here) moved slightly right to be able to turn left, he probably (yes I am hypothesising here) slowed even further down, other cyclist say what was happening & held back, yet this unfortunate soul missed all the warning & continued on
I have & all you do is bleat on about how's it's everybody's elses other than the never making a mistake downtrodden cyclist fault no matter what the circumstances are,
HELLO who are you are what have you done with the real Adrian?You appear to be reduced to just making stuff up and trying to make things a bit personal now.
But, if this is the case, he still needs to live with the fact that someone died under his wheels even though he did nothing wrong. He has to take responsibility for and live with the consequences of someone else's actions. That's a pretty sh*tty burden to have to bear when not at fault and he was just doing his job apparently responsibly. Could be tragic all roundHe (?) did nothing wrong. If the case, he will face no charges. The lawlessness amongst his colleagues is frightening and must be addressed.
Indeed. Overkill describes the current situation, though.I would have thought building whole segregated lanes just for tipper trucks a bit overkill. Just banning them until the learn to play nicely should be sufficient.
And how many other people was the Boris biker likely to kill?lets ban big Vans then too and Boris bikes , based on the nutty stuff I saw today . which included a female on a boris bike trying to go down a gap that was not safe to go down.
Whether or not that's accurate, should the punishment for a mistaken overtake-on-left be death? In any case, the motorist should "be aware of cyclists and motorcyclists who may be passing on either side" (Highway Code Rule 151).It's all too easy for contributors on a cycling forum to point all their ire at the trucker, but in this case it does look like this woman did herself no favours whatsoever...
Aren't you hypothesising that other cyclists said what was happening to her? Shouldn't drivers stop as soon as they realise a collision is imminent?he probably (yes I am hypothesising here) moved slightly right to be able to turn left, he probably (yes I am hypothesising here) slowed even further down, other cyclist say what was happening & held back