jay clock said:My partner has Vista on her laptop and I can see NO benefit to her or me from the changes over XP.
I'd agree with that. I stuck with Win2k for quite a while before going to Unix, but used XP at (then) work. Vista was on my wife's laptop when she bought it but the performance was shocking. It was a better spec machine than my old Win2k laptop but slower, much slower. Lord only knows what Vista was doing but it was certainly going about it the long way. To me, it seemed only to look different; as if MS had put a 'seamless integration' layer over the top of what was already there in XP and slowed the whole damned thing down.
hackbike 666 said:Does Linux run old Windows 98 progams though?
I run Windows programs (Garmin Training Centre, Cyclistats, SportsTracks and MotionBased Garmin upload agent) on my Ubuntu laptop in what's called a 'virtual environment'. That's a bit of software (in my case VirtualBox, but there are others) that allocates itself a section of hard disk and allows you to load another OS (in my case Win2k) into that area.
I like VirtualBox (mainly because it's free!) but also because it allows both the Ubuntu environment and the Win2k environment to see each other as if they were 2 machines on the same networe. So you can file share, drag and drop etc, across the 2 OSs.
You can also configure USB devices etc in the Windows environment (so using the correct proprietary drivers) and have them work there even though your Unix environment might not be able to do anything/much with them. Very neat.