To say Rodgers is over performing now is bollocks, he's a multiple world champion.
Yep, I've told myself the same thing. Logic doesn't always banish unease. Though I have to say today's stage certainly removed a lot of the doubts filling my mind.
To say Rodgers is over performing now is bollocks, he's a multiple world champion.
Simple. They want to win it on the road, not in an office/courtroom.I have said numerous times that when a rider is given a win after the event or hears that another rider has doped and doesn't go ape s*** then I question them
Yeah. Which is a bit late really and would we be having this conversation if DB & co had done due diligence on Leinders in the first place? They're only investigating long after the Twitter bird has flown the coop. Not great.Agreed on all counts. And Sky have just announced an investigation into Leinders. They've stressed that they know he is not involved in anything dubious for Sky (and he isn't involved with Sky at the TdF at all), but they are worried about 'reputational risk'. We'll see what they conclude.
I wonder if leading athletes in other drug-tainted sports are subject to the same innuendo and questionning? For example, I make five of the last seven 100 metres olympic champions to be drugs cheats...what sort of treatment has Usain Bolt been given?
Some have noted the lax nature of drug testing within Jamaican athletics, and even so there are quite a few athletes caught - 5 at the national champs in 2009, one of their top sprinters last year... but there certainly isn't the same level of attention paid by the media or fans as for cycling.
I only referred to Bolt because he's the current champion...it was more of a general point that I perceive there to be a higher level of suspicion aimed at a TdF champion than there is at a 100 metre champion. Yet the drugs records of the TdF and olympic 100 metres in the last 30 years are comparably awful.
Not really, my point was that when asked simple and direct questions they tended to wriggle and take refuge in the old 'I've never tested positive' line of defence rather than tell an outright lie. Wiggy used to speak up very eloquently about being clean and being hugely pissed off by the impact that dopers were having on the sport, specifically in terms of the way that they screwed up the perception of cycling. That stance was very much appreciated by fans and Wiggy used to have a rep for being outspoken on doping. I think he's blown that now, which is a shame.
Thought this was a really good piece.
Good stuff and nice to hear. There's just enough in there for the #UKPostal twits to latch onto (after all, LA used the 'I'd never dope because of my medical history' line, which was a big hit with his fans) but also lots forWiggy's supporters. For people like me (mildy concerned sceptic but not a cynic) it's reassuring, I just hope he accepts that he needs to keep banging that drum.Just read that article. Kind of kills the thread really. :-)
and then he will be accused of protesting too much?Good stuff and nice to hear. There's just enough in there for the #UKPostal twits to latch onto (after all, LA used the 'I'd never dope because of my medical history' line, which was a big hit with his fans) but also lots for Wiggy's supporters. For people like me (cheering quietly but still mildy concerned) it's reassuring, I just hope he accepts that he needs to keep banging that drum.