Rhythm Thief
Legendary Member
- Location
- Ross on Wye
er... no, because if there was one bloke called Geoff you'd just refer to him as "Geoff", you wouldn't refer to him as "THE Geoff".mr_hippo said:In contractions, the apostrophe indicates a missing letter(s) e.g. can't, doesn't, isn't, wasn't, etc.
The first one is correct, the second - are 'the Geoffs' a family? If Mr Geoffs and Mrs Geoffs both have a car then it is correct. If you are referring to Geoff (singular) and multiple cars then it would be 'the Geoff's cars'.
mr_hippo said:In modern usage, you do not need to use apostrophes with numbers - the 1900s, the 60s or with things like CDs.
yoyo said:Why are there two deliberate mistakes in the title of this thread?
Crackle said:posessive apostrophes. Never can remember.
That's Geoff's car
They're the Geoffs' cars
Is that right?
bonj said:er... no, because if there was one bloke called Geoff you'd just refer to him as "Geoff", you wouldn't refer to him as "THE Geoff".
My mistake for not proof reading
A lof of people think you do. As in, people who normally get all other usages of apostrophe correct. Especially with TLAs, you always get them used with them... Is it ok to? I would have said not, but am open to other interpretations...Although not correct, I think that it would be OK to use it.
Abitrary said:Think you can do the possessive ones how you like, like Jesus', Jesuses, Jesu's etc.
Sorry but no you can't!Abitrary said:Kate Mosses, Moss's, Mos'ses, Mosss