skwerl said:
Correct. Do you think employers in the UK (or elsewhere) exist out of a philanthropic desire? No. They exist to turn a profit, which is why more and more production (for Western companies) is being off-shored to the East.
I'm fairly sure that the Taiwanese aren't forced to work for the likes of Giant. They're still free to roam the mudflats with their chickens if they so desire. Maybe they'd don't get paid what they should/could (who does?) but they are there by choice.
no employers exist out of philanthropy, so it's a null argument either way.
i.e. the argument can't validly be used to support the idea of buying British, but it can't be used to explicitly support buying taiwanese either, as the employer will pay the market rate, which is largely dependent on what other jobs are around in that area which the workers could alternatively get if they so desired.
In other words, philanthropy argument isn't a valid argument against people's desire to buy british for the purely irrational, solely emotional, but entirely valid, reason that they
identify with people in britain, in a way that they don't with people from taiwan.
In other words, mickle's argument of supporting Mrs Woo is trying to be FAR TOO rational simply for rational's sake, when in fact the rationale behind it is basically just philanthropic - which going by my market rates argument applies no more to Mrs Woo than it does to Mr Bloggs of nottingham. So you might as well look to some other argument - given that it doesn't really matter to someone where their bike is made, they might as well therefore just support what they feel like supporting.