View attachment 543416
View attachment 543417
Two Accles and Pollock adverts from the 1930s.
Edit:
That's interesting about the origins of 501.
I've got absolutely no evidence to support my thinking, it just seems logical to me. A & P had a cro-moly product which was well proven and they will have had the metallurgical recipe, which Reynolds acquired. Since Kromo could be seen as a more or less direct competitor to 531, it is understandable it was dropped for bicycle frames.
However, when cro-moly began to appear from other suppliers, Reynolds could not do anything about this, other than try to maintain market share by offering their own cro-moly product. Since they already owned the Kromo recipe, why not just dust it off?
753 is another interesting one, because its formulation is just heat treated 531 - and Reynolds had been heat treating 531 years ago. They may have tinkered around with the exact method of treatment, but basically they already had the product and it had been experimented with.
Completely unrelated to bike frames, but there are a number of beers being brewed today where the brewers have dusted off their books going back 150 years and are now brewing beers based on Victorian recipes - generally with slightly reduced gravities.