Bonj trolls wonderfully as always. And do you know, I think I'd be disappointed with anything less!
bonj said:
I think it's probably a fake.
I think it's too early to tell for sure before it's excavated, although the descriptions and the initial GPR surveys look promising.
bonj said:
I think Liverpool just wants a bit of fame. Vikings didn't come over from Ireland did they! They came over from Norway.
If by 'Viking' (an imprecise term) you mean 'Norse' then yes, there would definitely have been a lot of sea traffic between Norse settlements in Ireland (e.g. Dublin) and the west coast of England, the Isle of Man, the Western Isles, the Northern Isles, Caithness, Sutherland, Færoes etc. etc. Saying, 'There were no Norsemen coming from Ireland!' is like claiming that there are no Indians living in Leicester because, duh, Indians come from India. Next you'll be telling me there were no Norsemen in Iceland either! We're talking about a culture that was the dominant power in the North Atlantic for some time, with people settled and established in places far, far away from Scandinavia.
bonj said:
Why would they have gone right round Scotland and gone to the west coast?
'Cos perhaps there was stuff there that they wanted? And perhaps they had stuff that the people there wanted. So they could trade. Towns and cities are born on such humble premises as this. (And earlier of course, they would have just taken the stuff they wanted - lots of rich monasteries in Ireland!) Also, it would have been 'friendly' territory? – Man and the Isles, northern Scotland and the northern Isles and much of northern England were culturally and linguistically Norse.
bonj said:
Smells a bit fishy to me.
Ha! Nautical humour! Bonj, you're the greatest.