UKIP's policies

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Little yellow Brompton

A dark destroyer of biscuits!
Location
Bridgend
10. Pedal Cycles
10.1 UKIP supports pedal cycles as a healthy means of personal transport, but is
concerned at the accident rate rising from 114 deaths in 2003 to 148 (2005), and the fall
in regular cycling according to the Department for Transport, despite so much promotion.
10.2 We believe that there needs to be a better balance of rights and responsibilities for
pedal cyclists, with too much aggressive abuse of red lights, pedestrian crossings and a
lack of basic safety and road courtesy.
10.3 There is also substantial amounts of bicycle theft, as David Cameron can testify to
personally. The British Crime Survey records c.440,000 bikes are stolen every year, but
many thefts go unreported. Halifax Home Insurance estimates a bike is stolen every 65
seconds in the UK.
10.4 According to CTC, the national cyclists’ association: “The police make almost no
effort to catch bike thieves... What’s more, the few who are caught face derisory
sentences” and this is reflected in a clear-up rate of around 5%28.
10.5 UKIP’s proposed new elected police boards could also put greater emphasis on
tackling bicycle theft, particularly in theft hotspots such as London, Reading, Bristol and
Oxford.
10.6 UKIP would consult on the desirability of minimum third party liability insurance
cover for cyclists - a simple annual flat rate registration ‘Cycledisc’, stuck to the bicycle
frame, to cover damage to cars and others, which are currently unprotected. The
Cycledisc should also carry clear identification details, which will help counter bicycle
theft, and deter dangerous cyclist behaviour. We support provision of cycle parking at
reasonable charges.
10.7 UKIP believes that basic cycle and safety training should be made mandatory, and
be funded in schools or via local authorities. UKIP supports the campaign work of
national cycling organisations.
10.8 Cycling on safe cycle routes, lanes, tracks and trails should be actively encouraged,
particularly as a leisure pursuit. UKIP believes off road dedicated lanes are preferable to
a confusing maze of cycle lanes on unsuitable or dangerous roads, which is problematic
for cyclists as well as other road users.
10.9 Local authorities should be given additional powers to enforce a ‘cyclists dismount’
or ‘no cycling’ regulation where there are safety concerns – such as on busy roundabouts,
junctions or bus lanes, or where the road would be too narrowed by cycle lanes and cause
unacceptable delays to traffic.
 

Sara_H

Guru
Not very well thought through.
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
"UKIP will slap any old thing down on its manifesto, knowing that most of you won't get beyond the anti-immigration rhetoric and we haven't a hope in hell of forming a government, and will pick on randomly odd policies to keep the Daily Express readership happy."
 
OP
OP
Little yellow Brompton

Little yellow Brompton

A dark destroyer of biscuits!
Location
Bridgend
As an Anglo-Indian (born and bred in the uk) ....
UKiP worry me just as much as the BNP but for vastly different reasons.
I can't help lumping them into the same basket!!!!
As Welsh UKIP worry me as much as the BNP. They are to my mind the policical wing of the BNP as much as Gerry Adams was to the IRA. They only have two policies, NIMBY and foreign is always wrong.
 

avalon

Guru
Location
Australia
Very amusing. They would be dangerous if they were a serious party.
 

Mile195

Veteran
Location
West Kent
And naturally compulsory third party insurance, cycle registration via a disc and "enforced dismounts" at roundabouts are all going to make more people want to ride. I'm quite capable of deciding myself whether or not I can safely tackle a roundabout thanks very much.

This little manifesto was clearly written by someone who has never picked up a bike, and has rather too much time on his/her hands.

Good job they'll never get in really...
 
They are indeed not a 'serious' party, but I am troubled by the casual support they have among many people I know or bump into.

I have seen them for some years now as a slightly mean-spirited and xeno-zealous BNP light. Nothing I have heard or seen in the past year has changed that view.

Yet I hear people at social events saying that they are tempted to vote for them. I find the thought risible, but the reality frightening.

I fear there will be UKIP MPs in Westminster after the next GE or the one that follows.

This sort of party feeds (as did BUF and others) on discontent, envy, jealousy and the like. In the current economic climate, it will have plenty to feed on.

The cycling policy is indeed ill thought-out, but many of us suspect that there are only two agendas here... everything else is padding or cheap shots.
 
Top Bottom