Chromatic
Legendary Member
- Location
- Gloucestershire
Scotland beat West Indies in the cricket World Cup qualifying tournament a couple of days ago.
Scotland beat West Indies in the cricket World Cup qualifying tournament a couple of days ago.
Why pick on Wimbledon in particular? As you say, the paralympics will have wall to wall coverage too, as will the Olympics, the Commonwealths, Cricket (Esp the Ashes), Rugby...
And to a lesser extent, also the the boat race, Formula 1 (etc), Ski Sunday, Swimming, Snooker, Horse-racing...
Nearly forgot to mention Football, which probably occupies more screentime than the rest put together; it certainly far exceeds tennis screentime. Odd that such an accessible sport as football is only enjoyed vacariously by millions who are so stuffed full of pies they can barely fit into their revered 3XL team shirt, and so out of their heads on lager they think it acceptable to bellow obscenities at the ref and opposing side.
Scotland beat West Indies in the cricket World Cup qualifying tournament a couple of days ago.
That is just not true. Olympics and Commonwealth games (and para- versions) may get similar levels of coverage, but none of the rest do.
Wimbledon is on both BBC1 and BBC2 at the same time for 6-8 hours per day.
Cricket, Rugby, Boat Race and all the rest are never on more than one free to air broadcast channel at any time, and often only highlights even then. Rugby during the 6 nations probably comes closest, but you are still only looking at one channel at a time, and 6 hours per week total.
Of course if you pay for Eurosport/BTsport/Sky sport, then you get wall-to-wall coverage, but you won't pay for any of those channels unless that is what you want.
You've not been paying attention if you're not aware of massive problems with football fans at every level, but I take your point that my lazy cliches apply to a small %. I've altered my post.That's a tad trite imo.
Myself and Mrs SD are football fans, as are many of our friends and family and to a man and women none of them fit that description.
Have you been to many football matches? We've been to lots over the years. There are always a few present who have drank too much and possibly fit your description; but most are just ordinary people enjoying one of their passions in a well behaved manner.
Tomorrow6-8 hour a day? That's more than I expected.
Tomorrow
BBC1 1:45pm - 6:00pm & 7:00pm - 9:00pm
BBC2 11:00Am - 7:00pm then "Today at Wimbledon" 9:00pm - 10:00pm.
So 6:15 on BBC1, 8:00 live plus an hour highlights on BBC2, and 4:15 of that where it is on both channels at eth same time.
There is no other individual sport that gets that sort of saturation coverage. Only the big multi-sport events like Olympics.
Wimbledon is the BBC's last remaining great sports event, unless they still show the (boring) Grand National. 🤔 It's a fortnight of high coverage, but that's it a mere two weeks! Many none pay to view folk look forward to a fortnight of tennis saturation entertainment. Let them have their fun.
Don't you have to pay a licence fee to view BBC?
6-8 hour a day? That's more than I expected.
On the other hand, daytime tv is utter dross anyway (on weekdays) , so no loss except for fans of bargain hunt.
I was thinking more weekends. Plenty of TV sport programming then, but yes - the qty varies per sport. I was just wondering why picking on wim in particular?
You've not been paying attention if you're not aware of massive problems with football fans at every level, but I take your point that my lazy cliches apply to a small %. I've altered my post.