Tour de France 2022 with SPOILERS

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Supersuperleeds

Legendary Member
Location
Leicester
But he's right, isn't he? He could be a convicted mass murderer - it wouldn't make everything he says wrong.

In my eyes, even when he is right, he is wrong. He shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near the sport, forget his past, but for someone who has been in the peloton he has a remarkable lack of understanding of what is actually going on, his commentary/punditry is woeful
 
He's a pretentious pr1ck,having to not listen to him makes GCNs fourty quid a year worth it alone.
Purely my own view of course.
Oh that's part of his charm!
 

Adam4868

Guru
In my eyes, even when he is right, he is wrong. He shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near the sport, forget his past, but for someone who has been in the peloton he has a remarkable lack of understanding of what is actually going on, his commentary/punditry is woeful
That's before you start on his accent 😁
 
In my eyes, even when he is right, he is wrong. He shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near the sport, forget his past, but for someone who has been in the peloton he has a remarkable lack of understanding of what is actually going on, his commentary/punditry is woeful

Not sure how I should view your 2nd statement, in the light of the first <scratches chin>

And anyway, good luck with escaping everyone with a past - the other channel has Contador lending his views, n'est-ce pas?
 

T4tomo

Legendary Member
I quite like Millar, and his Racing thru the dark book is a very good read.

If you're going to dismiss the views of every ex pro linked to doping then, for any ex pro over a certain age, you probably only have that french chap Lance bullied out of cycling. I'd gladly hear the views on tactics etc of Marco Pantani, except the poor fella is dead.

anyway, the bunch isn't giving the breakaway a sniff today. retune in with 6 or 7 km to go.
 

Supersuperleeds

Legendary Member
Location
Leicester
Not sure how I should view your 2nd statement, in the light of the first <scratches chin>

And anyway, good luck with escaping everyone with a past - the other channel has Contador lending his views, n'est-ce pas?
He is a drug cheat and in my opinion shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near the sport, but even if you ignore that he is useless as a pundit.

I think if cycling wants people to accept it is now clean then the least it can do is stop giving a living to those who doped in the past.
 
OP
OP
Dogtrousers

Dogtrousers

Kilometre nibbler
He is a drug cheat and in my opinion shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near the sport, but even if you ignore that he is useless as a pundit.

I think if cycling wants people to accept it is now clean then the least it can do is stop giving a living to those who doped in the past.

I could forgive him being a doper if he was interesting, relevant and not an utter twat.
 

AndyRM

XOXO
Location
North Shields
Millar raised important points about his mental health in Racing Through the Dark, which I found very relatable. Probably why I give him a bit of leeway than other's who've been caught.

Philippa York (no relation) is also a very interesting former pro IMO.
 
Some Tour de Femmes chat on the BBC:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0019b3l
38mins in.
"This Sunday we've got the Tour de France Femmes. It’s been called a “seminal” moment for women’s cycling because for the first time women will be able to wear the yellow jersey across eight days of gruelling cycling. We have Dani Every from British Cycling and cyclist Elinor Barker, an Olympic gold medallist and five-time world champion."
 
Top Bottom