Lol...so what is he 78kg compared to Pogacar 76kg ? Never be able to get up a mountain 🙄Despite his amazing allrounderness, it has been suggested (by Laurent Jalabert) that WvA is too heavy to be a GT contender.
He may well not be able to challenge for GT GC as he is now. I don't doubt that he could, but it would probably involve turning himself into a far less interesting and impressive rider.Despite his amazing allrounderness, it has been suggested (by Laurent Jalabert) that WvA is too heavy to be a GT contender.
Yea he had over 30 second lead over Pogacar at the top....finished in same group.So didn't take any risks descending.Totally, but I just thought he looked slightly more ragged than the others. I would be on the brakes!
He said to danish TV that he didn't want to take unnecessary risks and no recon prior to the race.He was also descending alone. With someone, he/they might have been able to maintain the gap.
The wording in bold is a bit careless. "Mass finish stage" clearly suggests a bunch finish, but I don't think that's what the numbers represent. Merckx's 18 is his total for all road stages, not just bunch finishes. But just to muddy the waters a little, I think Leducq may have 24 road stages (plus 1 ITT).I don't think there has ever been any danger of Cav coming close to winning a TT in the Tour
Mark Cavendish has the most mass finish stage wins with 33 ahead of André Darrigade and André Leducq with 22, François Faber with 19 and Eddy Merckx with 18.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tour_de_France_records_and_statistics
But Mercx won all kinds of stuff - sprints, TTs, mountains, you name it.
I think what they mean is "mass start" or maybe "road stage". Or simply, "Not time trial". That's how I read it anyway.The wording in bold is a bit careless. "Mass finish stage" clearly suggests a bunch finish, but I don't think that's what the numbers represent.
Miguel Indurin was no lightweight and he still won 5 TdF.Despite his amazing allrounderness, it has been suggested (by Laurent Jalabert) that WvA is too heavy to be a GT contender.
He was told not to take risks by the team apparently. It might explain his slightly odd style - ‘playing’ a bit to show he could go faster.Vingegaard doesn’t look a great descender. Could have pulled back quite a few seconds if he had held his lead he built up.
There is no way that Pogacar is 76 kg... I am a bigger build, about 10 cm taller than him, and weighed only 68.5 kg when I left university! I'd guess that he is closer to 65 kg?Lol...so what is he 78kg compared to Pogacar 76kg ? Never be able to get up a mountain 🙄
Just a guess ! Should have used Google.Still think Van Aert could be a Tour contender if he was the chosen one.From coming second in a sprint to winning like he did yesterday.There is no way that Pogacar is 76 kg... I am a bigger build, about 10 cm taller than him, and weighed only 68.5 kg when I left university! I'd guess that he is closer to 65 kg?
PS I just searched and various sites have him at 1.76 m tall and weighing 66 kg.
It's a percentage of the winners time. Exactly what percentage depends on two things : how fast the winner was (faster finish - bigger %); how hilly the stage is (hillier stage - bigger %).On the subject of the cut off....how is this calculated?