Fight.The.Power
Well-Known Member
There's an interesting question here, I feel, about punishment being appropriate to the results of the crime. To my eyes, it appears like every full-on sprint I have ever seen - bullish egos charging for the win - and that should be par for that type of finish.
And after a few hours reflection, I find I cannot concur with the Chris Boardman's assessment that it is unfair that Segan is being punished for the results of his actions, rather that his actions, in and of themselves (as others were doing something similar), and my argument is this: if you were to punch a person, you might be charged with assault, but if I were to punch a person, and they fell, hit their head and died, I might be charged with manslaughter.
The results of a person's actions do matter.
Personally, I think if you design a stage for a sprint finish for entertainment, you should impose only the bare minimum of conditions on the egos fighting it out - they know the risks.
The 2017 race will be slightly poorer for both their absences.
I think much of the punditry on ITV has been lacking today IMO. I usually subscribe to Eurosport as I think Carlton Kirby and Sean Kelly are unbeatable.
I have cheered at the top of my lungs seeing Miller going past on the Champs ahead of the peloton but he ain't a sprinter and he ain't a Classics man. And neither is Boardman.