Back on the subject of cryptic crosswords...
I was thinking that the clue I solved (see above) was a lot more obvious than the others, which I am still currently stuck on. I have noticed this kind of thing before and assumed that the puzzle setter had run out of ideas or just found it tricky to think up something clever for the last space in the puzzle. My puzzle guide points out that it is in fact a common thing to do. There isn't much point in a puzzle which is so hard that virtually nobody can solve it, so the setter sneaks in a few easier clues. If you spot them, you solve those first and that should give you several extra clues in the form of known letters for other answers crossing the ones that you have solved.
There are 202 puzzles in
The Times Big Book of Cryptic Crossword Puzzles, Volume #1. I'm going to try to get to the standard required to solve puzzle #1, and then try to live long enough to solve #2 - #202!
Time to study more of the guide, then try to solve another couple of clues...
Yes, I agree "guys" has become gender neutral.
I have been thinking about this subject recently...
I bought a Kindle book explaining how to write a book. I probably won't ever write one, but it is an interesting subject. (I read Stephen King's book '
On Writing', which is part autobiography, part writer's guide. I'd like to read more...)
The Kindle book is '
Becoming a Writer' by Dorothea Brande. It was written by her in 1934 and became a bestseller. Obviously, times were different then and she seems to use exclusively male pronouns. Most reviewers were content with this, given the age of the book, but one critical female reviewer declared...
A critic said:
... the worst offense though was her exclusive use of male pronouns. I know: It was written forever ago but she could've made an effort and used a mixed bag of pronouns to ensure inclusion.
Not really very likely in 1934!
But nowadays...?
I can see why the question is important, but there are traps! I have seen writers declare in their introduction that they will alternate pronoun gender chapter by chapter. Sure enough 'he, his, him' then 'she, her, her'... One problem was that the topics of the male chapters happened to be positive ones, and those of the female chapters more negative. That might lead to the suspicion that it was done deliberately! If turned round the other way, it could still be criticised for the same reason. The other thing is - the constant gender swapping feels odd.
I think it would make a lot of sense to just use gender neutral words all the time. In English, why not just settle on 'they, their, them'?