Time lapse photography?Well I'm certainly not the Sleeping Beauty. I'll give you 9/10 for spelling - missed out a "t". You could have had 10/10 but didn't show your "workings out."
........ and 🌬
View attachment 554637 View attachment 554637
View attachment 554637
View attachment 554637
Why's tha going?Well, I have not been on here for a while and nobody seem to be missing me and my continental knowledge so I am off, goodbye.
Quick update re the aunty.
..............
Main problem we can see is, with all the Covid stuff, they want her out.......but there is no care facility where she lives. It will take some thinking about .
We have just been discussing your advice. We will keep that in mind.Sounds like she is doing remarkably well, long may it continue, and, well done her!
Obviously, I am not familiar with the area in which your Aunt lives, but.....
I would expect that the Local Authority and/or Local NHS Trust (or whatever they are now called), may offer a degree of care, as an aid to get people our of hospital, one of my Sisters-in-Law worked in this area (in South Tyneside) until quite recently.
Alternatively, it may be possible to set up a "Care Package" with Social Services, my youngest daughter works in this area. (again, in South Tyneside).
A word of advice, based on dealing with my late mother's infirmity after suffering a Stroke. You get further if you play the unwilling participant, if you act eager and helpful, they will leave you to it, if you drag your feet and do not volunteer, they will step forward with help. Dreadful, I know, but, sadly, that is how the system appears to work, you have to know which buttons to press to get the care, to which you would expect to be naturally entitled. This is not a recent "innovation", my experiences were during the "Blair Years", I doubt it has improved.
Good luck
Sounds like she is doing remarkably well, long may it continue, and, well done her!
Obviously, I am not familiar with the area in which your Aunt lives, but.....
I would expect that the Local Authority and/or Local NHS Trust (or whatever they are now called), may offer a degree of care, as an aid to get people our of hospital, one of my Sisters-in-Law worked in this area (in South Tyneside) until quite recently.
Alternatively, it may be possible to set up a "Care Package" with Social Services, my youngest daughter works in this area. (again, in South Tyneside).
A word of advice, based on dealing with my late mother's infirmity after suffering a Stroke. You get further if you play the unwilling participant, if you act eager and helpful, they will leave you to it, if you drag your feet and do not volunteer, they will step forward with help. Dreadful, I know, but, sadly, that is how the system appears to work, you have to know which buttons to press to get the care, to which you would expect to be naturally entitled. This is not a recent "innovation", my experiences were during the "Blair Years", I doubt it has improved.
Good luck
Who's good at maths!
Knowledge of gear inches required.
What would be the top gear, in inches, using the SA 8-speed hub listed below.
62 chainring, 11 cog, on a 27" wheel.
View attachment 554716
That isn't gear inches! Gear inches are the diameter of wheel needed to give the equivalent gearing with a gear ratio of 1:1. In this case, that would be about 152.6 inches.No idea, but, could not resist a stab at it (waiting for soaps to finish and Mrs @BoldonLad to return to reality)
My thinking is, one turn of 27" wheel is 84"
62/11, direct drive gives 5.63 * 84 =. 473"
No idea if I am correct, be interested to know
Presumably, gear 1 is 30% less than 473" ? and so on ?
Time for a lie down
I've 229 at present.That isn't gear inches! Gear inches are the diameter of wheel needed to give the equivalent gearing with a gear ratio of 1:1. In this case, that would be about 152.6 inches.
That means the top gear (gear 8) in this case would be 3.25 x 152.6 inches, or around 496 inches.
Presumably this is for someone with the legs the size of an elephant, given that it is about 4 times the highest gear that most of us ever use!
That isn't gear inches! Gear inches are the diameter of wheel needed to give the equivalent gearing with a gear ratio of 1:1. In this case, that would be about 152.6 inches.
That means the top gear (gear 8) in this case would be 3.25 x 152.6 inches, or around 496 inches.
Presumably this is for someone with the legs the size of an elephant, given that it is about 4 times the highest gear that most of us ever use!
Yes, but diameter!Didn't 'gear inches' derive from the days of penny farthings, when the measurement indicated the circumference of the front (driven) wheel?
Sheldon Brown said:Gear Inches
One of the three comprehensive systems for numbering the gear values for bicycle gears. It is the equivalent diameter of the drive wheel on a high-wheel bicycle. When chain-drive "safety" bikes came in, the same system was used, multiplying the drive wheel diameter by the sprocket ratio. It is very easy to calculate: the diameter of the drive wheel, times the size of the front sprocket divided by the size of the rear sprocket. This gives a convenient two- or three-digit number. The lowest gear on most mountain bikes is around 22-26 inches. The highest gear on road racing bikes is usually around 108-110 inches. Unfortunately, the handwriting is on the wall for all inch-based measurement systems.