If Ms Norman says it's OK, it's OK. It'll stand up in court....
All barristers, including Ms Norman and including those who say something you like, win some cases and lose others.
You can say it may be the subject of a court hearing, but only a fool would make a certain assertion about the outcome.
It's far from clear what type of hearing it would be.
Failure to pay a fixed penalty notice issued for being somewhere you should not be will land you in front of the magistrates.
Do you think a bench is likely to have any sympathy with a cyclist who is before them in such circumstances?
You may say doing a long ride doesn't qualify you for a fixed penalty, but if that's what a copper decides to issue, that is what you have to deal with.
Putting your case in court may get the fixed penalty quashed on the barrister's reading of the regulations.
But the courts have a tradition of operating according to the public mood.
During the riots of a few years ago, plenty of people found themselves locked up for offences they would never have gone anywhere near prison for had their offences been committed in isolation.
Then there's the reputational damage to consider.
Such a case is bound to attract publicity, which is stress in itself and might go on for months pending a resolution.
Even if you win you will be branded a selfish, irresponsible twat by some on social media.
All under your real name and accompanied by a picture of you snatched at court or ripped from elsewhere on the internet.
I know what I'm going to do for April…something along the lines of what I did today. Never went more than about ten miles from home, the last seventy were all five miles or less from home. It got a bit repetitive…but given the wind speed, it helped- some shelter, some of the time, and I could do 'headwind for a bit, tailwind for a bit'. Social distancing respected in full…
This strikes me a good plan as any to reduce the risk of ending up on the wrong side of the law.
But that's all it does, reduce the risk, it doesn't eliminate it.