ianmac62
Guru
- Location
- Northampton
I've done a bit more work and ... now roughly this.....
http://goo.gl/maps/125Vw
They all look terrific but Calle to Sort looks amazing!
I've done a bit more work and ... now roughly this.....
http://goo.gl/maps/125Vw
I have revisited this. RidewithGPS is now on The Naughty Step. I am unsure if the numbers quoted above are correct. I was working out a different route (for a personal audax) in Spain, from Segovia to Santander, and then turned to Dell's planned route. RidewithGPS produced some very questionable figures for height gain, amd the elevation of climbs. For instance, it shows huge height gains for the first section but none at all for the second section. So my quoted figure for height gain is very suspect. If anyone can suggest a website that is more reliable we can obtain a more accurate idea of the hilliness of the route. Having looked at some Google Streetview sections, I suspect it is a relatively benign route.RideWithGPS says it has 8,900 metres of climbing and is 656k in all. So if we do it in six days it would be like riding up Ditchling Beacon (which is 200m of climbing) seven times a day. Or, to put it another way, like riding one Ditchling Beacon per hour, every hour of the trip. Every day for six days.
Try Bikehike.I have revisited this. RidewithGPS is now on The Naughty Step. I am unsure if the numbers quoted above are correct. I was working out a different route (for a personal audax) in Spain, from Segovia to Santander, and then turned to Dell's planned route. RidewithGPS produced some very questionable figures for height gain, amd the elevation of climbs. For instance, it shows huge height gains for the first section but none at all for the second section. So my quoted figure for height gain is very suspect. If anyone can suggest a website that is more reliable we can obtain a more accurate idea of the hilliness of the route. Having looked at some Google Streetview sections, I suspect it is a relatively benign route.
Well this is moving the ride from "Not on your Nelly" to finding some other excuse sinces I feel the inevitable sucking sound within my head of "why should the others have all the fun"?TBH, I'm not sure what this adds to the sum of human knowledge but I thought some details might help.
I'd treat the ridewithgps data with caution. In my experience the elevations can be wild over or under estimates. For example, La Marmotte is a recorded 5,000m climbing whereas the website has it as over 7,000m!Finally, Day 4 seems to have a lot of climbing – 4,597 metres thereof. But the steepest and highest section where the route goes over a high ridge is a long, steady angle. Not the short sharp stuff with which we were plagued in Normandy.
.
I'm a bit surprised you did not mention your theory of where the money ultimately comes from.And a glance at Google Streetview shows excellent tarmac, which again sits with my experience of the south of Spain in January. The government has spent a lot of money on roads.
It gets even better: Spanish mountains with German roads!I'm a bit surprised you did not mention your theory of where the money ultimately comes from.
The tricky thing at this stage is that the N-260 is being upgraded. Wnere it is upgraded they put in tunnels, which I don't much fancy (although I have ridden through some tunnels). The old N260 diverts round the tunnels, but Google Maps may be out of date, and we may get there and have to make it up as we go along.
in the main, yes - but sometimes they're cut by the new road, and sometimes the old road is turned in to a farm road. That's why there's no substitute for having a look, and making enquiries about future works.I would expext that they keep the old roads open for cyclists. That's at least how they deal with it in Norway, and on La Gomera.