jonny jeez
Legendary Member
- Location
- Chislehurst, Kent, UK
I have read some interesting comments about cycle lanes on this site and as a commuter in London i do see some of the perils of them.
I am about to make pose a scenario and please don't shout at me as its only something i have become aware of recently its not my opinion. This is a precis of the events and i do not know the details of the insurance companies involved.
I have heard of a recent accident in London from a friend whereby the cyclist was cycling within the traffic when there was a cycle path in play. The cyclist got knocked off by a car and both insurance companies are questioning why the cyclist was not on the cycle path.
Im sure we can see what's coming next.
Apparently the cyclist was informed that if a cycle path is in play then for safetys sake it should be used and an argument is in progress as to whether the motorists own insurance company will indeed pay up as they say the cyclist should have been on the cycle path.
Once again i am repeating this scenario NOT giving an opinion.
What do you think ?
Doest sound right to me, or at least it doesn't sound complete. I suspect there is more to the story such as the cyclist showing wilful neglect for safety in some additional way or perhaps the driver doing the same.
That said, I assume insurance companies will use any old shoot to avoid paying up.