I'm guessing Heinous is still there because it isn't in BC's power to remove him but he's going to be having a nasty influence until he's gone.
Absolutely. Resal makes a fair point about the evidence already being dealt with but that's hardly something Cookson could control until he was in a position too. Also I think the interview I originally linked to answers a lot of Resal's criticism of Cookson, don't know if he thinks that though."I don't like to think there was anything serious, but we had to take the precaution"
That's just good governance. If they had done nothing, they would have looked incompetent.
Holy Moly that is a lot of cash for a cash strapped organisation. I think £300,000 would fund a whole woman's team for a season !Cookson has taken a £76,000pa pay cut. (Or more importantly, we now know McQuaid was paid over £300,000 pa.)
true.Holy Moly that is a lot of cash for a cash strapped organisation. I think £300,000 would fund a whole woman's team for a season !
Aye, it'll look like dodgy horse trading to some but I'm giving Cookson credit for trying to loosen the omertà.Armstrong may be involved in the doping enquiry set up by Cookson - per BBC
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cycling/24724501