steverob
Guru
- Location
- Buckinghamshire
I know I'm a bit late (by six months!) to query the scoring system and maybe this is something that I should hold off until the 2017 thread goes up, but being a particularily sad stats obsessed geek, I'd like to suggest an amendment to the scores. I think there's too big a gap between the metric century and the imperial century for it just to count as one point extra - I feel you should get 5 points for 100 miles (all other points to remain the same).
The way I see it is that 31.07 miles gets you 1 point, 50 miles gets you 2 pts (= 25 miles per point), 62.14 gets you 3 (20.71 miles per pt), but if it's 100 for 4, that puts it back up at 25mpp again. 5 points would make it 20mpp, keeping it on a downward trend, rewarding you more for what you're riding.
And before anyone asks, no, this will not benefit me in any way! I've actually yet to do a 100 mile ride - the nearest I came was last year at RideLondon, when I did 92.86 miles (due to the Leith Hill diversion), so all my previous scores would stay exactly the same, no matter how many points a century ride was worth!
The way I see it is that 31.07 miles gets you 1 point, 50 miles gets you 2 pts (= 25 miles per point), 62.14 gets you 3 (20.71 miles per pt), but if it's 100 for 4, that puts it back up at 25mpp again. 5 points would make it 20mpp, keeping it on a downward trend, rewarding you more for what you're riding.
And before anyone asks, no, this will not benefit me in any way! I've actually yet to do a 100 mile ride - the nearest I came was last year at RideLondon, when I did 92.86 miles (due to the Leith Hill diversion), so all my previous scores would stay exactly the same, no matter how many points a century ride was worth!