I have no reason to doubt the accuracy of your comment. But, leaving aside the legalisms, can you not see why many of us are angry that this man did something illegal, killed someone as a consequence, and essentially got let off?
At the very least he should never be allowed to drive again.
Mind, if he is such a devout believer maybe he'll be so overcome with remorse he'll stop driving and devote his life to telling others of his errors. Well, we can all hope.
The judge followed the sentencing guidelines, so the correct sentence was passed - that's a matter of fact.
The anger is understandable, although in this case I don't share it - that's a matter of comment.
Sentencing has always been based on a mixture of the level of criminality and consequences.
The criminality of the driver in this case was he allowed himself to be momentarily distracted while driving, the consequences were he killed someone.
It's not easy to balance a sentence when the two factors - criminality and consequences - are at opposite ends of their scales.
Your remarks about remorse may have been sarcastic, but you may accept a law abiding working family man will be severely troubled by having the death on his conscience.
That is what the judge was on about in his sentencing remarks:
Recorder Donald Tait said: “I hope this case will send a message to other road users, who we see day in and day out using mobile phones or other devices.
“It perhaps takes the tragic circumstances of this case to bring home the seriousness of doing this and I just hope other people will learn the lesson.”
Read more:
http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Lor...tory-27991629-detail/story.html#ixzz3oqIH5pue
Follow us:
@heraldnewslive on Twitter |
theplymouthherald on Facebook