jefmcg
Guru
In 1906 after a competition to guess the weight of an ox, Francis Galton asked to see the individual entries with the expectation of being able to show what idiots the mob consists of. However, when he averaged the entries, the result was closer than to the weight than the actual winner. Thus a crowd 800 people of all levels of intelligence and knowledge was wiser than the best experts.
Many things on the internet try to use this. The most famous, Wikipedia, fails in my opinion as you can't somehow use averages to create narrative. What really works, is strava routes. Imagine if you could ask every serious road cyclist in a region the best route between two places. But better than that, just find out which roads they turn off or on to at each point; avoiding the busy sections, the pot holes, the dirt tracks; seeking out the beautiful descents, the challenging climbs and magnificent views.
Normally if I am planning a long ride, I'll spend a few hours with google maps and streetview, also googling existing rides through the area and audax gpxs. But this weekend, I was invited on short notice to stay in the peak district. I thought cycling part of the way back would be fun, but I didn't have time for all that before I had to leave, and I didn't want to take a laptop with me. So I spent 1/2 hour with strava routes and nationalrail.co.uk, plotting a doable distance with an affordable train service. Then yesterday I put my trust in the crowd, and followed that route.
It was wonderful. Too hilly, of course, because I'm a soft Londoner, but quiet roads with little traffic and amazing views, and towns with good cafes within half an hour of me thinking "time for a little something"**. I really can't imagine there is a better route from Kettleshulme to Coventry.
Strava has a way to use the routes directly from their app, but I didn't try that this time. I'll do it next time I go for a cycle.
TL;DR? "Strava routes are brilliant!"
http://www.strava.com/routes/1118587
http://www.strava.com/activities/215510357 (slow, I know. London legs, and a long while since I've done more than 20km).
**damn, that's close to a Paddington Bear quote, but google isn't helping.
Many things on the internet try to use this. The most famous, Wikipedia, fails in my opinion as you can't somehow use averages to create narrative. What really works, is strava routes. Imagine if you could ask every serious road cyclist in a region the best route between two places. But better than that, just find out which roads they turn off or on to at each point; avoiding the busy sections, the pot holes, the dirt tracks; seeking out the beautiful descents, the challenging climbs and magnificent views.
Normally if I am planning a long ride, I'll spend a few hours with google maps and streetview, also googling existing rides through the area and audax gpxs. But this weekend, I was invited on short notice to stay in the peak district. I thought cycling part of the way back would be fun, but I didn't have time for all that before I had to leave, and I didn't want to take a laptop with me. So I spent 1/2 hour with strava routes and nationalrail.co.uk, plotting a doable distance with an affordable train service. Then yesterday I put my trust in the crowd, and followed that route.
It was wonderful. Too hilly, of course, because I'm a soft Londoner, but quiet roads with little traffic and amazing views, and towns with good cafes within half an hour of me thinking "time for a little something"**. I really can't imagine there is a better route from Kettleshulme to Coventry.
Strava has a way to use the routes directly from their app, but I didn't try that this time. I'll do it next time I go for a cycle.
TL;DR? "Strava routes are brilliant!"
http://www.strava.com/routes/1118587
http://www.strava.com/activities/215510357 (slow, I know. London legs, and a long while since I've done more than 20km).
**damn, that's close to a Paddington Bear quote, but google isn't helping.