Strange Crank Failure

  • Thread starter Deleted member 1258
  • Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

wafter

I like steel bikes and I cannot lie..
Location
Oxford
Don't confuse 'Hollowtech' crank design/manufacture with Hollowtech 2 axle and BB 'technology'/Shimano standard. On the same crankset but two discreet design aspects.
Both the FC-5800 and FC-R7000 cranks are touted as having both technologies, and from the seams in the spider look to be of the same construction as the Ultegra and DA cranks. I wonder why there have been far fewer (if any) reported failures with these lower-spec models..?
 

Drago

Legendary Member
Interesting observation. Certainly looks like it's a problem with the bonding; being a luddite I was a bit disappointed to see that this much-touted "Hollowtech" format relies on bits being glued together.
Don't be too disappointed. Properly executed, bonding is stronger than welding, even stronger than the material itself.
 

Gunk

Guru
Location
Oxford
Both the FC-5800 and FC-R7000 cranks are touted as having both technologies, and from the seams in the spider look to be of the same construction as the Ultegra and DA cranks. I wonder why there have been far fewer (if any) reported failures with these lower-spec models..?

I’ve got the 105 5800 version of that Ultegra crank that failed and it looks identical, however the 105 series is slightly heavier so perhaps it’s just a bit more robust.
 

Proto

Legendary Member
It happened to a mate of mine two weeks ago. Not sure if mileage, but low I think, possibly less than 5k. He’s in touch with Madison looking for resolution.

512951


512952
 

Milkfloat

An Peanut
Location
Midlands
I am not sure why the knowledgeable guy in the video has not come across many examples in Northern Europe, I have heard of quite a few, both on forums and in real life. The problem with a warranty claim or even an out of warranty good will gesture is that it can take months to resolve.
 

wafter

I like steel bikes and I cannot lie..
Location
Oxford
I saw this video on YT today - the chap who does it is an aerospace engineer and he puts out some very informative videos and thus far I've had no reason to doubt his reasoning. It would be interesting to see @Yellow Saddle 's viewpoint on this one.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rj__lexd_BI

Thanks - a pretty insightful video IMO :smile:

It seems that the argument for failure beginning due to corrosion at the joint in the spider holds the most weight; since any moisture sealed inside the assembly will be a function of the place it was manufactured; not where it's being used (which seems to be a significant factor).

My first thought regarding the voids was to dry them thoroughly and fill them with some sort of sealant / corrosion inhibitor; however if this is hydrocarbon based I think there's also the danger of it degrading the adhesive in that area and causing a similar failure; albeit through a different mechanism.


I’ve got the 105 5800 version of that Ultegra crank that failed and it looks identical, however the 105 series is slightly heavier so perhaps it’s just a bit more robust.
Bugger! I agree about the heavier build of the 105 cranks, but if we'r talking adhesive failure due to (presumably) the action of oxidation of the crank material forcing the two parts of the crank apart, I can't see how the thicker walls assumed from the 105's heavier construction would make any difference.

Another angle might be material choice - perhaps the Ultegra and DA cranks are made of a different grade of ally that's perhaps stronger (to allow thinner, lighter construction) but also more prone to corrosion...?

I'm still taking some comfort from the Instagram feed mentioned in the video, since of all the images of failed cranks it contains there are no 105s pictured, so they must be less prone to failure if not immune as your example has proven. Don't suppose you still have it? In light of all this it'd be interesting to take a closer look!
 

alvintc

Veteran
Location
West Sussex
I had a similar failure. Discovered when I went to the 312 a couple of years back. Luckily I found a shop that had a spare crank in (I had to search a lot as it was pretty busy!) - let me see if I can find a picture of my failure




512957

512958

512959
 
Last edited:

Drago

Legendary Member
Holy Mary mother of Trump! As a good an advert as any for the proper pre-ride checks that so many riders seem to pooh-pooh...until it happens to them.
 
Location
Loch side.
Some interesting pictures here. It would be useful if they could be correlated to batch numbers or failing that, years of production.

A note on "bonding". Can we please just call it glue? Don't "cold set" the terminology.
 

wafter

I like steel bikes and I cannot lie..
Location
Oxford
Don't be too disappointed. Properly executed, bonding is stronger than welding, even stronger than the material itself.
... and when not properly executed it leads to situations like this :blink:

Pointless checking mine, it’s only done about 100 miles, it was only fitted recently
Ahh, sorry - I mis-read your post and thought yours had failed. If not that certainly bodes well for those running 105 :becool:
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom