edindave
Über Member
- Location
- Auld Reeker
Stop at lights? Yes unless they're green.
... and it is clear to proceed.
Stop at lights? Yes unless they're green.
In general I would never jump a red light but there are a few sets near me on very quiet roads that are triggered by pressure pads under the road. I have been sat a one set for over 5 minutes waiting for a car to come along and trigger it, so I have to say if the road is clear I will go on red at one of these junctions.
I'm pretty sure there is stipulation for this circumstance whereby you can go through a red light if it will not trigger.
Off topic a little, but I see cyclist's on the pavement (and not those just nipping to the local shop or kids), and apart from the legal aspect, I wonder how much extra hard work it is to stop at junctions cross as a pedestrian (be it on the bike or not) and then continue cycling, is it quicker, sure cant be easy.
I find this, those I have used, and generally full of nasty things the dont like tyres too much.I've started riding my whole route to work on the road. There is a cycle/shared use path most of the way, but it is slower to use this because are quite a few junctions I have to prepare to potentially stop at. One of the junctions is particularly busy and somewhat of a blind corner, I can't see cars indicating until a short distance before they turn (thats if they do bother to indicate), so I sometimes jump off and push the bike, it feels safer and I can turn my head to look easier. On the road it is easier since I don't have to look over my shoulder as often, I can just follow the flow of the traffic.
It's a very sensitive issue for cyclists. If everybody used the streets with consideration there would be no problems whatsoever - we wouldn't even need pavements. But we have a private car entitlement road culture and, almost without exception, traffic lights and one way systems exist to regulate the dangers presented (but simultaneously condoned) by this sense of entitlement. Somehow cyclists got caught up the road regulations as traffic despite not being part of the danger (yes, I know some cyclists cause accidents and there have been fatalities to pedestrians, usually on pavements and caused by ''entitlement'' cycling" - luckily, none this year as far as I know). Cyclists have a different degree of moral obligation to obey the rules of the road but it's a moral obligation all the same. How you deal with the ''us and them'' argument is one you'll regularly come up against. You may accept this argument or you may decide that the ''us and them'' approach preceded anything any living cyclist might do on today's roads.... Whatever, you'll still have to accept the sanctions of the law when they are applied.
Personally, I have no problem at all with considerate road use, even when it's at odds with car-centric legislation because that's how living streets work. Just don't expect any approval from cycling forums.