Perhaps I didn't say it properly. It's not the rides and their intentions which I was having an issue with it was more the way they were being described.
I know these are part of the century a month challenge, but they started out as "rides for fish and chips" then "for food" which happened to cover 100 miles. They came across as much more sociable which could explain the 20 odd riders on the January ride to Maldon (in the middle of winter). There was an option to drop out half way or ride back which suited most. I've noticed fewer riders and (excluding this one) fewer newer riders and some regulars who I enjoy the company of on the more relaxed/shorter rides.
I'm sure I can keep up but I didn't want them to become too exclusive to just the faster riders. Personally I was starting to be put off slightly even though I know full well I can keep up.
Perhaps we just needed to arrange more rides to satisfy all levels.
It was just something that was bugging me a bit.
anyway....
And there was no need for that.
I know these are part of the century a month challenge, but they started out as "rides for fish and chips" then "for food" which happened to cover 100 miles. They came across as much more sociable which could explain the 20 odd riders on the January ride to Maldon (in the middle of winter). There was an option to drop out half way or ride back which suited most. I've noticed fewer riders and (excluding this one) fewer newer riders and some regulars who I enjoy the company of on the more relaxed/shorter rides.
I'm sure I can keep up but I didn't want them to become too exclusive to just the faster riders. Personally I was starting to be put off slightly even though I know full well I can keep up.
Perhaps we just needed to arrange more rides to satisfy all levels.
It was just something that was bugging me a bit.
anyway....
If you cant keep up on a ride of such pace, dont go (or if you are unsure if you can manage, go with a get out plan where you can bail and find your own way home).
And there was no need for that.