Bonefish Blues
Banging donk
- Location
- 52 Festive Road
... which has a single concentration of population, by the looks of it. Let's be sensible.All within a small area, that doesn't cover all the parish.
... which has a single concentration of population, by the looks of it. Let's be sensible.All within a small area, that doesn't cover all the parish.
So bikes doing less than the speed limit (which doesn't apply to them), are more dangerous than cars exceeding the speed limit that does apply to them?
The speed limits do apply if the bike is being actively pedalled (not freewheeling down a hill) from memory the offense is something like "cycling furiously"So bikes doing less than the speed limit (which doesn't apply to them), are more dangerous than cars exceeding the speed limit that does apply to them?
“...perhaps more alarming were the cyclists who on average came past the bus stop at between 30 to 35mph,”
The speed limits do apply if the bike is being actively pedalled (not freewheeling down a hill) from memory the offense is something like "cycling furiously"
I was thinking of the 1847 Town Police Clauses Act,I'm afraid that's wrong on all counts.
Speed limits do not apply to cycles (excepting Royal Parks) and there is no offence of cycling furiously. You may be thinking of the offence for which Charlie Alliston was convicted after he struck and killed a pedestrian, Kim Briggs, which was the offence of furious driving. Note that this offence is only applicable when the furious driving results in bodily injury to a third party.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/24-25/100/section/35
I was thinking of the 1847 Town Police Clauses Act,
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/10-11/89
which mentions nuisance caused by driving or riding furiously, and by precedent that has (a very long time ago) been applied to bicycles...
I was thinking of the 1847 Town Police Clauses Act,
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/10-11/89
which mentions nuicance caused by driving or riding furiously, and by precedent that has (a very long time ago) been applied to bicycles...
*rubs chin* Jimmy Hill.
As the fastest times for the whole 1.74km of that segment average at over 40mph, evidently not!https://www.strava.com/segments/2418017
Looks like the road has steep grade so 30+mph is not out of the question going downhill.
https://www.strava.com/segments/2418017
Looks like the road has steep grade so 30+mph is not out of the question going downhill.
*rubs chin* Jimmy Hill.
A fuller picture than hitherto.As the fastest times for the whole 1.74km of that segment average at over 40mph, evidently not!
The finishing line is about 75 metres beyond this bridge, opposite the entrance to the village stores:
View attachment 471237
As the fastest times for the whole 1.74km of that segment average at over 40mph, evidently not!
The finishing line is about 75 metres beyond this bridge, opposite the entrance to the village stores:
View attachment 471237
I was thinking of the 1847 Town Police Clauses Act,
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/10-11/89
which mentions nuicance caused by driving or riding furiously, and by precedent that has (a very long time ago) been applied to bicycles...