Speedwatch group more alarmed by cyclists than speeding cars...

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
OP
OP
tom73

tom73

Guru
Location
Yorkshire
So bikes doing less than the speed limit (which doesn't apply to them), are more dangerous than cars exceeding the speed limit that does apply to them?

:wacko:

Not forgetting " lots of bare flesh" we seamingly flash as we speed past :rolleyes:
 

chriscross1966

Über Member
Location
Swindon
So bikes doing less than the speed limit (which doesn't apply to them), are more dangerous than cars exceeding the speed limit that does apply to them?

:wacko:
The speed limits do apply if the bike is being actively pedalled (not freewheeling down a hill) from memory the offense is something like "cycling furiously" :biggrin:
 

glasgowcyclist

Charming but somewhat feckless
Location
Scotland
The speed limits do apply if the bike is being actively pedalled (not freewheeling down a hill) from memory the offense is something like "cycling furiously" :biggrin:


I'm afraid that's wrong on all counts.

Speed limits do not apply to cycles (excepting Royal Parks) and there is no offence of cycling furiously. You may be thinking of the offence for which Charlie Alliston was convicted after he struck and killed a pedestrian, Kim Briggs, which was the offence of furious driving. Note that this offence is only applicable when the furious driving results in bodily injury to a third party.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/24-25/100/section/35
 

chriscross1966

Über Member
Location
Swindon
I'm afraid that's wrong on all counts.

Speed limits do not apply to cycles (excepting Royal Parks) and there is no offence of cycling furiously. You may be thinking of the offence for which Charlie Alliston was convicted after he struck and killed a pedestrian, Kim Briggs, which was the offence of furious driving. Note that this offence is only applicable when the furious driving results in bodily injury to a third party.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/24-25/100/section/35
I was thinking of the 1847 Town Police Clauses Act,
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/10-11/89
which mentions nuicance caused by driving or riding furiously, and by precedent that has (a very long time ago) been applied to bicycles...
 

Ming the Merciless

There is no mercy
Location
Inside my skull
I was thinking of the 1847 Town Police Clauses Act,
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/10-11/89
which mentions nuicance caused by driving or riding furiously, and by precedent that has (a very long time ago) been applied to bicycles...

Sorry that link points to a whole load of stuff including chimneys catching fire. Did not find this furious bit can you indicate which clause it is on that page?
 

LCpl Boiled Egg

Three word soundbite
*rubs chin* Jimmy Hill.

Indeed. Chinny reck-on.
 

Aravis

Putrid Donut
Location
Gloucester
https://www.strava.com/segments/2418017

Looks like the road has steep grade so 30+mph is not out of the question going downhill.
As the fastest times for the whole 1.74km of that segment average at over 40mph, evidently not!

The finishing line is about 75 metres beyond this bridge, opposite the entrance to the village stores:

Postbridge.jpg
 

Bonefish Blues

Banging donk
Location
52 Festive Road
As the fastest times for the whole 1.74km of that segment average at over 40mph, evidently not!

The finishing line is about 75 metres beyond this bridge, opposite the entrance to the village stores:

View attachment 471237
A fuller picture than hitherto.

If one then looks at crashmap for the area, there have been a lot of serious accidents on that road (although only one with slight injury at that specific location, interestingly), so the sensitivity of the community can perhaps be understood.
 

glasgowcyclist

Charming but somewhat feckless
Location
Scotland
I was thinking of the 1847 Town Police Clauses Act,
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/10-11/89
which mentions nuicance caused by driving or riding furiously, and by precedent that has (a very long time ago) been applied to bicycles...


I've been able to find only a single reference to the use of that act in relation to cycling, back in 1997.

A rider was stopped by police for doing 25mph in a 30 zone, arrested and reportedly faced a fine of £120 which he was refusing to pay. It's clear therefore that the
cyclist was not prosecuted for speeding.
Rather, the pretext for the police's action was, as you mentioned, Section 28 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847 which refers to the furious driving or riding of any horse or carriage. However, there's no subsequent reporting that I can find of his conviction or acquittal so it may be that it never reached court.
 
Top Bottom