Everyone knows everyone in Norway.It would be interesting to know how many of those Norwegian murders and manslaughters are committed by complete strangers and how many by friends and relatives who know each other.

Everyone knows everyone in Norway.It would be interesting to know how many of those Norwegian murders and manslaughters are committed by complete strangers and how many by friends and relatives who know each other.
Women + alcohol = fights(and they're on the increase).Because in the good old days, no one ever got glassed or bottled in a pub? My dad used to run pubs, he got hit over the head with a bottle...50 odd years ago (big bloke, 6'4)
Men + alcohol = fights (or can do)
Ftfy.
IMO nothing about alcohol that induces violence or violent behaviour, but it does embolden idiots and scumbags that already have violent, antisocial tendencies and no self-control. For some people, going out, getting drunk and having a fight is their idea of a good night!
Not sure if I am reading your post correctly here but I'm sure I must be mistaken because to me it reads as though you are saying being drunk IS an acceptable excuse for drunk driving!!!!!I dislike the way in which alcohol is given as an acceptable excuse for criminal and/or anti-social behaviour, as in, "the defendant had drunk 11 pints of beer, and cannot remember breaking and entering the house, m'lord". The only exception I can think of is drink driving.
Not sure if I am reading your post correctly here but I'm sure I must be mistaken because to me it reads as though you are saying being drunk IS an acceptable excuse for drunk driving!!!!!
I think it's imagination. Like if you go to Barcelona or Naples, you get told not to go in La Raval or the Spanish Qtr, so you do and everything is fine.
I agree. In this time of 24 hour news, the internet and social media we all become much more aware of incidents of violence. In addition, I think that some benefit from raising the profile of violence to further their own agenda. Unfortunately we get sucked into this idea that we are living in a dystopian, violent society rather than that peaceful idyll we grew up in. We aren't. It's pretty much as it's always been.I don't buy it, the increase in violence. There are places in the Leeds/Bradford conurbation l wouldn't choose to walk in late at night, drug areas, doubt they are any more violent than 40 years ago.
I am always out 4 or 5 nights a week "socialising" I've not noticed any increase in aggressive behaviour in the UK and until 4 years ago l worked nationwide.
I think it's imagination. Like if you go to Barcelona or Naples, you get told not to go in La Raval or the Spanish Qtr, so you do and everything is fine.
Agree - and apart from some folk outside london saying it's violent as hell you get some folk saying that certain areas are uber dangerous. In truth you are as likely to get attacked by a street crazy in the supposedly posher more respectable bits.
And the most nastiness I ever come across is when I stray into some bits of the cchat politics bit - and even that has improved.
I agree. In this time of 24 hour news, the internet and social media we all become much more aware of incidents of violence. In addition, I think that some benefit from raising the profile of violence to further their own agenda. Unfortunately we get sucked into this idea that we are living in a dystopian, violent society rather than that peaceful idyll we grew up in. We aren't. It's pretty much as it's always been.
It's cool, I know you're not straw manning me. That's a genuine and fair question.Wouldn't that posit that a large part of the UK population suddenly decided to let itself go in the last ten years, for no apparent reason? It would also seem to suggest that in the 1930's everyone in the UK and US did the same, only to pull themselves together in time for world war 2.
I'm not trying to straw man you, honestly, it just seems an odd argument.
I've heard it suggested that poverty of itself doesn't cause violence, but inequality does.
It's cool, I know you're not straw manning me. That's a genuine and fair question.
I spent most of my professional career dealing with herberts who lived in poverty because their persistent criminality made them unemployable. In short, that's the lifestyle they chose.
I forget the exact stats, but back in the day it was reckoned 100 of these individuals accounted for something in the order of 70% of all crime in the county.
Over 80% of violent crime had alcohol as a factor, not poverty.
Over 90% of acquisitive crime had alcohol and/or drugs as a factor, not poverty.
There will of course be people out their who commit theft because of unfortunate circumstances or poverty. I have met them. I have spent my own money on food and a pair of trainers for one of them, had a whip round with other officers to buy food for others. While I've been out the game for a few years now I'd still be comfortable in saying that those who commit acquisitive crime through genuine hardship is still the minority, and even then poverty is no excuse of justification for violent crime of any type.
I agree. In this time of 24 hour news, the internet and social media we all become much more aware of incidents of violence. In addition, I think that some benefit from raising the profile of violence to further their own agenda. Unfortunately we get sucked into this idea that we are living in a dystopian, violent society rather than that peaceful idyll we grew up in. We aren't. It's pretty much as it's always been.
That's it! I posted previously about being coerced into joining a neighbourhood watch scheme, I was bombarded with msg's keeping me up to date with every crime reported locally, yikes, scary stuff! De-listed myself and my life went back to normal, nothing is happening.....my motorbike was being stolen from my garage last December and my neighbours posted live time reports on Facebook instead of contacting the police or......ME. The modern world.![]()