Silly STRAVA Racing

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

zizou

Veteran
If you have loads of KOMs on segments where there are a lot of participants, I would say you are quite exceptional. In London at least, you need to be really motoring for a KOM.

KOM particularly urban ones are so condition dependent - volume of traffic, getting a run through the lights, wind, solo v group, how long the ride is and so on. You've got to be at a certain level to be able to take advantage of favourable conditions but strava palmares can be very misleading as to a persons ability in relation to others.

You get to know the local leaderboards and recognise the names not just from strava but the 'real world' too - i ride with or have raced against a fair chunk. There are a few (like myself :biggrin:) who go segment hunting in favourable conditions whereas others dont and as a result they languish below on the leaderboards. Stick a number on their back though and it is a different story - a few weeks back I got a 4th in a cat 4 leaderboard - i got this during a race on a climb that i started near the front but got passed by at least 20 riders who i then lost contact with which effectively ended my race. Yet i upload to strava and i'm the 4th fastest time up the hill....the reality was somewhat different and a more accurate reflection would be me trailing on page 2 of the leaderboard.
 

TheJDog

dingo's kidneys
KOM particularly urban ones are so condition dependent - volume of traffic, getting a run through the lights, wind, solo v group, how long the ride is and so on. You've got to be at a certain level to be able to take advantage of favourable conditions but strava palmares can be very misleading as to a persons ability in relation to others.

You get to know the local leaderboards and recognise the names not just from strava but the 'real world' too - i ride with or have raced against a fair chunk. There are a few (like myself :biggrin:) who go segment hunting in favourable conditions whereas others dont and as a result they languish below on the leaderboards. Stick a number on their back though and it is a different story - a few weeks back I got a 4th in a cat 4 leaderboard - i got this during a race on a climb that i started near the front but got passed by at least 20 riders who i then lost contact with which effectively ended my race. Yet i upload to strava and i'm the 4th fastest time up the hill....the reality was somewhat different and a more accurate reflection would be me trailing on page 2 of the leaderboard.

I don't really count most urban sections as "serious". I don't think I've ever even, in all the times I've been there, had a clean run around Regent's Park, for instance. But something like Swain's Lane, 1400 odd entrants, it's man vs hill, I think anyone who is in the top 10 there is a very fit or strong or both fellow.

I don't doubt there are fitter people out there. If I could get into the top 10%, I'd be astonishingly happy (currently 20s off that)
 

gaz

Cycle Camera TV
Location
South Croydon
If you have loads of KOMs on segments where there are a lot of participants, I would say you are quite exceptional. In London at least, you need to be really motoring for a KOM.
I got 2 KOMS in London where there are more than 2,000 people listed as trying it. Both of them I was motoring it on a light bike.
 

Mapster1989

Senior Member
Personally I hate segments which include traffic lights. Encourages RLJ's which is a big no-no.

I like the loooong segments which are 15-20 minutes long on either the flat or an ascent. A small increase in speed results in a big time difference and a bigger jump up the leaderboard. On the short ones I feel you need to put 10x more effort in to just get 2-3s faster.
 

400bhp

Guru
I don't really count most urban sections as "serious". I don't think I've ever even, in all the times I've been there, had a clean run around Regent's Park, for instance. But something like Swain's Lane, 1400 odd entrants, it's man vs hill, I think anyone who is in the top 10 there is a very fit or strong or both fellow.

I don't doubt there are fitter people out there. If I could get into the top 10%, I'd be astonishingly happy (currently 20s off that)


Agree-hill segments are much more reflective of general ability:

- most people are forced to try up a hill
-if you're going up hills you're more of a serious cyclist therefore there's a natural selection of the fitter cyclists on the segment.

Of course, not discounting the length, gradient and nature of the climb too.
 

Hip Priest

Veteran
Agree-hill segments are much more reflective of general ability:

- most people are forced to try up a hill
-if you're going up hills you're more of a serious cyclist therefore there's a natural selection of the fitter cyclists on the segment.

Of course, not discounting the length, gradient and nature of the climb too.


Agreed.

I figure quite highly on a lot of segments round here, but the serious hills bring me back down to earth!
 

potsy

Rambler
Location
My Armchair
Agree-hill segments are much more reflective of general ability:

- most people are forced to try up a hill
-if you're going up hills you're more of a serious cyclist therefore there's a natural selection of the fitter cyclists on the segment.

Of course, not discounting the length, gradient and nature of the climb too.
*de-activates strava account* :whistle:
 

Andrew_P

In between here and there
I agree about hills, the other factor with hills is how often you have been up it. I went up a totally unknown hill and under normal circumstances without Strava I would have been fairly pleased with doing 11.3mph but I was a lowly 47\124 which kind of re-syncs your view.

I am fairly sure I could improve on that just by riding it a few times, I was trying to keep something in reserve as I had no clue where it was going to end as it had a few turns and flat spots. Once ridden you would know that you could either rest or blast on the flatter spots. That being said I had ran out of gears on my compact 11-25 by the top:blush:
 
Top Bottom