A
another_dave_b
Guest
doily said:My desperately unfashionable - but steel - commuter, no longer with toeclips.
Is that a Ridgeback Horizon?
doily said:My desperately unfashionable - but steel - commuter, no longer with toeclips.
Smokin Joe said:A bit of back pressure on the pedals is as good as any rear brake (which is why the law allows you to do without) as they only have the stopping power of a blamange before they lock up. Two hoods ok, but no caliper, please.
another_dave_b said:Is that a Ridgeback Horizon?
Joe24 said:How can empty hoods look silly? You still have the brake lever on there, it just sits there though and doesnt pull anything.
The onyl reason you can tell its not got anything in it and its just there to grip, is if you look for the cable.
I think having one brake there looks worse.
2 brakes on a fixed, ok i dont mind. I had two on, and i know people who had two on for when they went somewhere hilly and so they werent just using the front brake when going down steep hills and didnt want their legs spinning too much.
Saying an empty brake looks silly is total rubbish though, it looks the same as one with a cable in, except theres no cable coming out from the bar tape on that side
I do only have one brake on my fixed, i dont see a need for a rear brake. And when my chain came off, yes i was without a rear brake but i still stopped fast enough.
Does this brake hood look silly?
MajorMantra said:It hadn't occurred to me that you might leave the lever in. When I said empty I meant missing the brake lever, so yes, that looks completely normal. I think a hood without a brake lever would look odd but hey, it's just a matter of taste.
I probably would bother with a rear brake if I were building up a fixed but my Genesis Flyer came with one fitted and I can't think of any good reason (fashion isn't one) to remove it. The weight is negligible and it means replacing brake blocks less frequently.
Matthew
Smokin Joe said:Can people please stop putting back brakes on fixed wheel bikes?
It's not cool, it's not clever, and it's not nescessary
Tharg2007 said:well here are mine if you haven't already seen them
Oh and fossyant, that MTB thing you have, looks a little small compared to the others, another thing, that external tap could use some filler around it.
no I agree entirely but I have to say your bars look incredibly narrowJoe24 said:Does this brake hood look silly?
zzpza said:project - apollo (halfrauds)
jules.
i dont have it in order to slow down, i have it partly because the lever's going to be there anyway, but mostly in case i need to do an emergency stop, or in case the front brake fails on a descent too steep to control speed by leg braking.wicker man said:no - I don't give a sh*t about coolness and fashion. I find there are situations where it is 'practical' (eg. strong following wind and long descents, when spinning to control the speed by gentle braking without interrupting the suppleness of pedalling and putting different pressure on your legs and knees by back pedalling), especially on long rides. I'm happy with it and I'll stick with it