RWright
Guru
- Location
- North Carolina
I think I'm just allergic to hard work! Felt a real slog this morning. Wind and rain plus legs that didn't feel very strong.I think I might be allergic to the cold.
tis dry here, but have other things to do today... so also no progress..Wet!
(No progress.)
Well, I did manage the longer ride I hoped for yesterday - 82.4km with 729m (51.2 miles and 2,400ft) according to Strava. This is the longest and toughest ride I have managed for 24 years - my last really long ride was the Great Yorkshire Bike Ride in 1990, and I still have the 'T' shirt somewhere to prove it!
That however is only half the story.
Planning the route last night I spotted one of those dreaded steep uphill arrows across the road, with no alternative way round it. After considering, and rejecting several alternatives I decided to go for it.
Everything was fine until I saw the 1 in 6 sign.
Ok, that's steep, but just slow down and you'll be fine... Next I saw the short steepest bit.... Oh xxxx.
Pedalling up, out of my seat.... Very hard work.... Who put the brakes on..... Why does this bike weigh four times what it did a minute ago..... Who fitted the anchor to my bike, and can I get rid of it.....
I got up the steepest section, but had to stop to recover before finishing the hill. Maybe next time...
The payoff for the effort was a lovely downhill section. Not too steep, and no sharp bends and not too busy a road. I love it when cars stop going past me as I head downhill. Strava shows a maximum speed of 64kmh, and I must have done about that for best part of a mile.
Definitely tired legs now, but I am pleased with the ride - and it was almost all dry!
if you are interested, you can see the route here: http://www.strava.com/activities/210700659.
been out today again battling winds tough not so hard as Tuesday ones. went with mate and his boss
no idea what my av speed was as me and mate's boss been waiting couple of times for him on top of hills.
http://connect.garmin.com/modern/activity/618355904/0?lang=en
i dont like garmin too but my friend supplied me with this link only so not like i had a choice lolHow are you getting a long with GC?
I think I like it although it is not very flexible re graphs etc.
Impressive ride!
I don't always 'get' Strava gradients - they always seem low. I tracked all the way along the profile and couldn't find the 1 in 6 (well done for getting up that!) anywhere.
I agree - I'm not sure whether it was the road sign or strava overstating the slope. The segment "Stainburn Bank" on the ride has a maximum gradient of 15.8%. Whatever it was, I found it VERY steep!
Strava always reduces the height climbed compared to my Satmap gps. However, I tend to trust the Strava figures more than the gps. The gps has a margin of error of say 5m, which isn't much in terms of distance, but can be significant in terms of height gained. I use the gps for walking as well as cycling, and find that if I walk any distance on a flat path (such as a canal towpath), it will record "phantom" ups and downs. I suspect that this problem will be worse when the gps signal is poor - such as when cycling or walking under trees.
Strava is pants at elevation, do this create a segment for the whole ride and you will see what I mean, rwgps gives better figures.I agree - I'm not sure whether it was the road sign or strava overstating the slope. The segment "Stainburn Bank" on the ride has a maximum gradient of 15.8%. Whatever it was, I found it VERY steep!
Strava always reduces the height climbed compared to my Satmap gps. However, I tend to trust the Strava figures more than the gps. The gps has a margin of error of say 5m, which isn't much in terms of distance, but can be significant in terms of height gained. I use the gps for walking as well as cycling, and find that if I walk any distance on a flat path (such as a canal towpath), it will record "phantom" ups and downs. I suspect that this problem will be worse when the gps signal is poor - such as when cycling or walking under trees.
I agree - I'm not sure whether it was the road sign or strava overstating the slope. The segment "Stainburn Bank" on the ride has a maximum gradient of 15.8%. Whatever it was, I found it VERY steep!
Strava always reduces the height climbed compared to my Satmap gps. However, I tend to trust the Strava figures more than the gps. The gps has a margin of error of say 5m, which isn't much in terms of distance, but can be significant in terms of height gained. I use the gps for walking as well as cycling, and find that if I walk any distance on a flat path (such as a canal towpath), it will record "phantom" ups and downs. I suspect that this problem will be worse when the gps signal is poor - such as when cycling or walking under trees.