@SatNavSaysStraightOn I found that on the 705, like on the mapping page (opposed to the course mapping), I have ascent. decent, and elevation sometime grade (though I think this feature isn't to accurate), or gps accuracy, if I am using mapping though I tended to use the course one, which has time & distance to next course point, and then speed & distance, the main page I have speed, distance, cad, avg cad, hr zone, avg hr, avg sp, and time ridden 2nd page I change but keep time of day on it, if I am using a course I have the bryton showing cad speed in Km/h and distance in Km as I tend to do distances in Km i.e. 60, 70 or 80 Km if on a decent ride otherwise like today I just use then to record
The 705 has been pretty solid since I had a play with it, I went back to firmware 3.1 and set it to smart recording opposed to every second, the bryton I use as backup as it records everything and on yesterdays ride there was only 0.01 miles difference over 50.23 miles the bryton showing 50.22 miles. The biggest difference is in elevation the 705 is pretty close to that corrected with rwgps usually within 10% usually rwgps is a touch higher, though strava tends to higher than both using the data from the unit, the bryton is way off, the raw data actually records it as a liner graph until correcte on rwgps and strava (and few other things) though the bryton site does this as you upload it.