QUOTE=bonj;646961]don't really argue with that, apart from the fact it's largely meaningless, and doesn't really make sense: "the same" radio stations - the same ones
as what?
the shipping forecast will only tell you whether or not you're likely to be blown 100metres off course, the simple solution is just to not sail within 100m of dogger's bank...
![Sad :sad: :sad:](/styles/default/xenforo/smls/sad.gif)
you don't tend to get that problem on land since you don't have the problem of getting blown off course, largely due to your friction with the ground ...
I haven't really got much idea what you mean by "where does it fit into the scheme of things", but i'll try to answer what i think you mean, which is does it rely the shipping forecast - probably yes, but i'm not sure what that proves. It doesn't make the shipping forecast useful in a mainstream way.[/QUOTE]
See
http://www.cyclechat.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=30425&highlight=wind
also
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/marine/shipping_forecast.html which gives the area covered in the shipping forecasts.
Note that "Mid Atlantic" isn't covered. And would that be mid North Atlantic or mid South Atlantic?
For back on dry land are you trying to say that a side wind has never caught you out, by blowing you off course. Most would correct for it, if they were able. The same would apply to any waterbourne craft. They would also make allowances for the weather. Don't you do that on dry land, before venturing out.
As for the same radio stations(Radio 4, RTE Radio 1) both give shipping forecasts & traffic forecasts/reports
Ben Fogle & Jim Cracknell rowed accross the Atlantic. No sail, no inboard or outboard motor. How does their craft fit into your definition of shipping, given you posted a picture of a small sailboat. Which you said wasn't shipping.
Are you sure what your not talking about?