Shimano 105 R7000

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Ming the Merciless

There is no mercy
Location
Inside my skull
I saw it but its a 50/34 crankset these not enough hills for that sort of gearing, I'd lose that top end on the flat

Lose top end on the flat? 50/11 is good for 30 mph!
 

Ming the Merciless

There is no mercy
Location
Inside my skull
His is 48..

Alot of roads can hit 40 at full intensity

And how long exactly can you hold almost 1100 watts? I presume you must race cat 1 if you can regularly hit 40 mph on the flat, and you race on Shimano 105?

64EE715B-8F70-4C84-8FBA-C5EEE0CC43A1.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Gunk

Guru
Location
Oxford
Its a great buy for someone with a quality frame and a worn Sora/Claris etc groupset/or 3rd party chainset as the big brands often do.
Spesh Allez a good example ... £1000 for latest one with Claris 8 sp/Tektro rim brakes! That's just cheeky.

The annoying thing is that I recently sold a really clean Ribble Ali frame for sod all, I could have built it up with one of these 105 groupsets and a cheap wheelset, I’ve got everything else
 

Alex321

Guru
Location
South Wales
His is 48..

Alot of roads can hit 40 at full intensity

Yes, for a few seconds.

If you are racing at a pretty high level and competing in sprint finishes, then you may need higher gearing than that. But then you wouldn't be looking at 105 anyhow.

Nobody except fairly high level racers is going to exceed 35mph on the flat for any significant period. And not many of us are going to hit even 35 without trying pretty hard.

And at 50x11 on a 700c wheel with 28c tyres, it is only 111 rpm to hit 40mph.
 

Samyo

Über Member
Yes, for a few seconds.

If you are racing at a pretty high level and competing in sprint finishes, then you may need higher gearing than that. But then you wouldn't be looking at 105 anyhow.

Nobody except fairly high level racers is going to exceed 35mph on the flat for any significant period. And not many of us are going to hit even 35 without trying pretty hard.

And at 50x11 on a 700c wheel with 28c tyres, it is only 111 rpm to hit 40mph.

Yeh it started with "lose top end" what else does top end mean? Im riding on the road, with tailwinds, lorrys/cars passing, not every road is flat af. My 1 minute power is around 720 watts and 5 sec power is 1250w

72kg at 6ft 3
 

Alex321

Guru
Location
South Wales
Yeh it started with "lose top end" what else does top end mean? Im riding on the road, with tailwinds, lorrys/cars passing, not every road is flat af. My 1 minute power is around 720 watts and 5 sec power is 1250w

72kg at 6ft 3

To most of us here, "lose top end" when saying that those gears are no good for you would mean something rather a lot more than not being able to get your ultimate 5 seconds of speed.

Most of us would read it as meaning something you could sustain for a minute or two at least, and possibly more, if you are saying that you would reject those gears because of it. If you aren't a high level competitive sprinter, then your 5 second power is fairly meaningless.
 

Dogtrousers

Kilometre nibbler
To most of us here, "lose top end" when saying that those gears are no good for you would mean something rather a lot more than not being able to get your ultimate 5 seconds of speed

You're over thinking things. "Lose top end" just means that higher gear ratios aren't available. No more, no less.

I remember years ago, possibly when I changed to 105, being berated by one of the gear police for having a 50/11 gear because I'd have to be going at (insert pointless calculation) mph to spin out in that gear at (more pointless calcs) rpm. Still have my 50/11 top gear. Still use it when I want to.
 

Alex321

Guru
Location
South Wales
You're over thinking things. "Lose top end" just means that higher gear ratios aren't available. No more, no less.

I remember years ago, possibly when I changed to 105, being berated by one of the gear police for having a 50/11 gear because I'd have to be going at (insert pointless calculation) mph to spin out in that gear at (more pointless calcs) rpm. Still have my 50/11 top gear. Still use it when I want to.

50/11 is pretty well the standard top gear with a "compact" chainset. But I agree that I hardly ever use that top gear except on downhills.

I was responding to the way he was using it, which was meaning the top gear isn't high enough for his top end power. Not your sense of the top gears not being useable (on the flat) for us mere mortals.
 

Samyo

Über Member
I got a 52/39 chainrings instead as i couldn't find my 53/39 105 10sp setup

If i remember rightly, previous bike was 52/39 and i felt better on that than the 53 ring
 
Top Bottom