I watched the finish yesterday - I think the last 5 minutes - and was impressed to hear Phil get all the riders correctly identified in the closing stages, until I remembered that they'll have re-recorded the commentary after the event to make it look like he had a clue and the live commentary would have been a garbled load of old bollocks.I just watched the cyclingnews clip of the crit with Phil & Paul mangling the English language. Quite nostalgic!
The sound recognition subtitles are pretty funny with Peter Sagan coming out as Peter Cigar.
There were certainly a few "front end of the main field"s, some "young man" with "a promising career in front of him" and prime tourism announcements (with video footage rather more blatently irrelevant than helicopter shots of landmarks) but 9am was a bit too early for me to start the drinking game!I watched the finish yesterday - I think the last 5 minutes - and was impressed to hear Phil get all the riders correctly identified in the closing stages, until I remembered that they'll have re-recorded the commentary after the event to make it look like he had a clue and the live commentary would have been a garbled load of old bollocks.
Men's Stage 2 highlights final 3km definitely interesting but I wonder if peaking now means someone's going to be no good for the GTs. The classic and stage 1 finales may be interesting if you want to see Sagan trying to become a leadout man.I haven't seen any of either race yet. Is it worth catching up with?
P&P&Robbie McEwanWho's doing the commentary? Not the Muppets I hope.
I wonder if peaking now means someone's going to be no good for the GTs.