smokeysmoo
Legendary Member
- Location
- Bolton, not very far from Nob End
because i don't want a twot in a car thinking they can drive faster and closer to me than they should. as you will be aware builders helmets are PPE - the last line of defence. the hazards should be removed before PPE is used . i.e. educate drivers about leaving room and looking. and yes cyclists are not blameless
because i don't want a twot in a car thinking they can drive faster and closer to me than they should. as you will be aware builders helmets are PPE - the last line of defence. the hazards should be removed before PPE is used . i.e. educate drivers about leaving room and looking. and yes cyclists are not blameless
I agree, most of the motorist i have come across are fairly sensible and leave plenty of room but there are a still a huge number of drivers with driving skills which leave a lot to be desired! Had a driver try to overtake me then take the first left exit eventhough i was ahead of him. He nearly knocked me over and all he could say was sorry...If you know it is wrong and dangerous then why do it?because i don't want a twot in a car thinking they can drive faster and closer to me than they should. as you will be aware builders helmets are PPE - the last line of defence. the hazards should be removed before PPE is used . i.e. educate drivers about leaving room and looking. and yes cyclists are not blameless
People will argue that full face helmets impede your field of view, are hot and heavy. But most have yet to test some of the modern day full face helmets which i have used. The don't impede your field of view much at all and are very breathable and only marginally heavier than your typical road helmet. But i agree that verbal communication isn't too great ina full face helmet but who would you be talking whilst at the same time riding?
I do accept them. But even if manufacturers were to completely iron out these issues. Would you wear one?"Much at all", is means they do
"very breathable" does not equal completely
""maginally heavier means heavier, means more mass for the helmet to absorb, but built to the same ( minimal) standard .
You ignored "They would reduce my ability to ... hear..." a very valid complaint for a cyclist.
You asked for a reason, got three , tried to downplay them whilst not answering or accepting them.
I do accept them. But even if manufacturers were to completely iron out these issues. Would you wear one?
Is that Q3?I do accept them. But even if manufacturers were to completely iron out these issues. Would you wear one?
I I have done a fair bit of down hill mountain biking in the past and it is widely accepted that riding down hill without a full face helmet is quick way to lose your life, teeth and looks due to the increased risk of having a crash in comparison to road biking.
However on a road biking the likelyhood to having a more serious crash is vastly increased due most of us travel just marginally slower than most cars.
2276583 said:Answer a question in return. Would my wearing a full face helmet on the road giveobserversdrivers the impression thatcycling is a relatively safe activity or a relatively dangerous onecyclists are really well protected so we don't need to take care near them?
No.... if manufacturers were to completely iron out these issues. Would you wear one?
Errr .... this^^^^^No! No, no, no, no, no, no, no. NO.