Yes I read your posts,how out of context? You said it was a design flaw if they specd the wrong material. They had admitted in the published statement they, not the supplier had spec'd the wrong material. i.e. That is how it was designed by them, and you then said it was not a design flaw it was a spec problem. Your two posts totally contradict each other. I really can't be bothered with this but you seem to be intent on having the last word, so to reiterate, my point is that to me it is surprising that a manufacturer with the experience of hydraulic brakes of SRAM and it's associated companies from their mountain biking background, released a product with ended up with such a critical problem. Mountain bikes operate in extreme conditions so to me the temperature the initial failures took place is irrelevant. This remains my view. If you had read the statement from Sram before responding to my post in the first instance, you would have realised that the issue was more than just a supplier problem as this was stated. It is your perogative to disagree, but just say I disagree. It is easier all round and stops threads ending up in silly tit for tat pedantic exchanges.
