No it won't. But it does make it hard for cyclists to mitigate against such circumstances. And I don't mean to sound like I am vicitim blaming - I'm not. [...]
It may be hard, but dealing with incompetent motorists is always hard and the infrastructure doesn't make it significantly harder overall: on the drawbacks, cyclists may be about a metre closer riding correctly on a cycleway than in secondary position on a wider carriageway (we should always ride such a cycleway in a position as far as possible away from any blind corners formed by driveway gateposts/hedges, not Franklin's middle-of-track nonsense); but on the benefits, a motorist driving blind will pretty much only ever be crossing in front of them, not coming up behind. If the misted-up motorist emerges once a cyclist started passing the driveway, the cyclist will almost always be past and out of reach before the motorist gets there, if the cyclist is on the outside of a cycleway 2m wide or more (any narrower past driveways shouldn't exist and shouldn't be used). Well, unless the motorist reverses out at such speed that they'll enter the carriageway blind without any stopping distance and very few drive quite that suicidally!
These incompetent motorists are far more dangerous to pedestrians who move more slowly and are always crossing the driveway mouths more closely. They pretty much have to peer around every hedge corner to be safe, such is the abysmal average behaviour of motorists.
