biggs682
Itching to get back on my bike's
- Location
- Northamptonshire
Soon be time to get my lenton out and enjoy some more miles on it
since bikes were often bought as a frame and parts (for tax reasons) I don't think there's really such a thing as "correct" equipment, if your gear is age appropriate then that's just fine!Very nice. Looking at yours I can see that I have issues over my handlebars, mudguards and wheel nuts. My handlebars are not stamped Raleigh but are stamped 'Maes' and 'Reynolds tubing'; my mudguards are alloy stamped 'Bantel'. They will all go back on after restoring but will not look Lenton like at all. I'll send you the photos when I take them.
I feel that some of differences in the equipment can be part of the bikes history. Some parts could have been damaged or worn and would have needed replacing. Some parts could have been an upgrade which the previous owner thought necessary or thought improved the looks of his bike.
The 50's and 60's was a long time ago and attitudes and availability of parts and equipment will have changed over the years. Unless the previous owner managed to maintain his bike in pristine condition any replacement parts would have depended on what was available at the time and so variation would be inevitable.
I must agree. Provided they are not utterly dangerous bodges, don't look unsightly, and function well I tend to leave period modificartons in place. They're part of the bikes history as much as its dings and battle scars.
Indeed, I'm not averse to a few of my own. I rebuild my Claud exactly as per original spec, but I tend to ride up on the hoods to fitted Tektro aero brake levers - it's quite a subtle mod that most people dont spot at first glance, and it increases rideability for me hugely. Similarly, I fitted SPD ledals but went for M540s with the natural alloy finish, and the warm polished appearance suits the bikes character very well.
I am now part of that bikes history and in 30 or 40 years another custodian of this fine machine may wish to make their own subtle changes to keep the bike relevant for modern use, yet still retain its essential character. Far better than it being weighed in for scrap.
It's both tatty and "wrong" and when I bought it (for £35 I think) everyone thought I was mad, but it's a fabulous ride and my son and I love it.
Also, no-one would look twice at it when parked up, so it's really practical too! View attachment 455145
That's so true - I've seen loads of examples of folks having had expensive paint jobs etc then been too scared to ride it!but it will be all the more useable and practical for not being "too nice to use" in case it gets knocked and scratched.
That's so true - I've seen loads of examples of folks having had expensive paint jobs etc then been too scared to ride it!
I think my photos of the Yello Peril don't really show how disgusting its mix of nasty paint and even nastier rust it actually is!
So would I.LOL, mikeymustard To me anyway theres nothing disgusting about a bike thats used, i would rather see the Yello Peril out on the road than something like an expensive 931 Genesis volare with etap etc hanging in a garage and not used.
LOL, mikeymustard To me anyway theres nothing disgusting about a bike thats used, i would rather see the Yello Peril out on the road than something like an expensive 931 Genesis volare with etap etc hanging in a garage and not used.