Cost is another problem
WHen we have considered going places some distance away we have sometimes looked at using the train but when you add up the cost of two tickets and compare it to the cost of petrol and parking
then the car comes out cheaper - often by quite a lot
But that's not how train prices usually work for anything but the shortest journeys or at peak times. More often, you buy an annual discount card and get two discounted tickets, or you buy some sort of area (ranger or rover) tickets with boundary extensions, or a group ticket. Like for my trip this week, my wife already had a Network Railcard, which allows a group of up to four adults (including her) and four children to buy discounted tickets within the south and east. Previously we had a "Two Together Railcard" but that's not worth renewing until next trip outside the SE.
Of course, pricing should be simpler and cheaper. Ideally something like the Netherlands tap-on-tap-off nationwide system, combined with a "best price guarantee". But it's not and trying to treat it like it is will either see you pay more than you should, or avoid taking the train because you think it'll be more expensive than it is.
And it's also ignoring the cost of driving time. Maybe your time is worthless and you work for free, but mine isn't.
Then there's all the money and time costs of keeping a car, but until public transport works well enough again, we're stuck with most of them whether we use it or not. Only servicing becomes less frequent.
You seem to be on some sort of political rant there but all I will say is whilst of course better public transport be great, I chose to live where I do so I'm not blaming anyone for not providing a bus that runs outside my front door to every location I might want to go to.
Political rant maybe, but it's not party political because I don't think any of the current leading parties have a credible plan to fix this everywhere, and it's transport-related because of course bikes should be how we get lots more people to travel hubs, enough people so that public transport works in even pretty low-density areas, in line with this video's ideas:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOkN255il7U
but all I will say is whilst of course better public transport be great, I chose to live where I do so I'm not blaming anyone for not providing a bus that runs outside my front door to every location I might want to go to. [...] drove to train station to pick up daughter. Took me 20-25 mins to drive there. By bus be one hour 50mins [...]
Not every location, but taking people to and from train stations seems like something that should be well-served and 1h50 is not a viable travel service. I think some experts set the limit at 30 minutes, but I'd relax that slightly in rural areas.
You take the high ground and not blame people. Let me blame your local council for you: they sound utterly incompetent at delivering useful public transport!
Anyway, think we've veered off original point of this thread.
A bit. I believe it's linked because until we have viable alternatives to driving for most people, judges, juries and prosecutors will be among those who hesitate to stop people driving who really ought not to be driving, so we see weak sentences like this example. And cycling would be much safer if we got those people away from the steering wheel before someone gets hurt, whether by punishment or simply by enticing them not to drive.