The programme focused on extremes. For cyclists they had plenty of red light jumpers, for car drivers they had a couple of crazy 4x4 drivers and for pedestrians they had an old chap who couldn't get across some non-pedestrianised traffic light (I did feel sorry for him!)
It was interspersed with some sensible comments from commentators (although the lady motor columnist did say a few peculiar things!). John Franklin had about 2 sentences about cycling down the left of large vehicles. It's a shame he wasn't given more air time.
I actually cheered at one point. Strangely enough it was the kids protesting about RLJing cyclists. Good for them!! However, it did paint cyclists in a pretty poor light.
I have never been a fan of critical mass, and the section focusing on it did firm my views against it. Really what is the point of it? It just serves to irritate drivers and alienates drivers further!
I found myself grumping about many of the cyclists road position an although drivers certainly have a responsibility to drive carefully around us, it did look like cyclists were sometimes their own worst enemies.
The piece on the cyclist that was killed by the truck was saddening, and it appeared that the truck did overtake and left hook. If this was indeed the case then the driver was 99% at fault. However, had the lady cyclist been further out it might have put the driver off the maneuver. I am certainly not saying this to criticise the lady cyclist, I just wanted to point out to those who advocate cycling close to the curb the possible benefits of primary/secondary positions.
I should say all the stories of death were saddening. In fact you couldn't help but feel sorry for the chap who lost his wife at the traffic light pedestrian crossing.
My 2p worth anyway. What do others think?