RIP - Hadrian’s wall tree

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Dogtrousers

Kilometre nibbler
They're denying it, so unless they change their plea we will never know.

Not necessarily. They're pleading not guilty, but they may claim that yes they did indeed cut it down but they did so in self defence, because it went for them. You know what trees can be like.
 

Dogtrousers

Kilometre nibbler
The point I was (badly perhaps) trying to make is that we gleefully rip up acres of countryside with little comment on the destruction but one solitary tree has gathered a lot of news coverage.

I'm not particularly fussed about this incident. Some people cut down a tree illegally. It does seem to have struck a nerve with the rest of the country, but I'm obviously a callous tree-hating bastard because it seems relatively trivial to me. I agree that there are more important (and entirely legal) matters that should, but don't, cause national concern.
 

Profpointy

Legendary Member
Not necessarily. They're pleading not guilty, but they may claim that yes they did indeed cut it down but they did so in self defence, because it went for them. You know what trees can be like.

You may jest - a tree squashed my car once ! And just to be clear it was parked up and I was no-where near it honest guv'

Even flowers can be dangerous as stated by one of our greatest philosophers


View: https://youtu.be/cihz-Ftq6wU?feature=shared
 

T4tomo

Legendary Member
They're denying it, so unless they change their plea we will never know.

....aren't we therefore likely to find out more, if they plead guilty they go straight to sentencing with no court room discussion.

The prosecution will surely put forward some sort of argument on motive and then see how the cross examination progresses.
 

DaveReading

Don't suffer fools gladly (must try harder!)
Location
Reading, obvs
....aren't we therefore likely to find out more, if they plead guilty they go straight to sentencing with no court room discussion.

The prosecution will surely put forward some sort of argument on motive and then see how the cross examination progresses.
And even if they don't mount a successful (or indeed any) defence in court, their briefs can plead mitigating circumstances (however unlikely they might be) on their behalf when it comes to sentencing.
 

Drago

Legendary Member
....aren't we therefore likely to find out more, if they plead guilty they go straight to sentencing with no court room discussion.

The prosecution will surely put forward some sort of argument on motive and then see how the cross examination progresses.

They're denying chopping down the tree. Thst being the case it's difficult to see how we'll discover their motivation for chopping it down as they're saying it wasn't them Guv.

The prosecution might put forward an argument, possibly even the correct one, but unless the villains cough the job we'll never know for sure what their motivation was. Guv.
 

Badger_Boom

Veteran
Location
York
I'm not particularly fussed about this incident. Some people cut down a tree illegally. It does seem to have struck a nerve with the rest of the country, but I'm obviously a callous tree-hating bastard because it seems relatively trivial to me. I agree that there are more important (and entirely legal) matters that should, but don't, cause national concern.
I was more concerned about the harm caused to Hadrian's Wall. We can't grow another one of those.
 
Top Bottom