Linford
Guest
I don't disagree with this, and certainly for in people in their 90's
Have you got any similar data on serious head injuries for a comparison ?
The article I quoted said that the risks were not actually increased in the over-90s, probably because the people would have died anyway.I don't disagree with this, and certainly for in people in their 90's
Have you got any similar data on serious head injuries for a comparison ?
You recall the crash I witnessed of another friend a few years ago. His first point of contact was his head when he hit the road, He suffered no head or neck injuries, but broke his hip and femur. The hip was put right that night and has not bothered him since.
The article I quoted said that the risks were not actually increased in the over-90s, probably because the people would have died anyway.
You seemed to be disputing the seriousness of a broken hip with this comment:
And you seemed unaware of the risk of death after such an injury.
As for head injuries ... I'm doing hips - if you want to do heads then you can do the Googling!
Even I know, and I'm no engineer, that replacing a buggered BB is a swift and cheap 15-minute job.I only got it on the thursday evening before. The rest of the weekend was taken ferrying people around the hills in the 4x4. The BB on my own bike is buggered , and so hateful to ride, I was happy to not bother.
Brings back unhappy memories ... Still, 97 is a pretty fine age to reach.Absolutely not. My GMIL died at the age of 97 about 7 years ago after breaking her hip. I was at her bedside when she went
Going back to the original question ...What I am saying though is that a comparison should be made like for like in cyclists or motorcyclists to see how each fare. No more or less
Even I know, and I'm no engineer, that replacing a buggered BB is a swift and cheap 15-minute job.