The Surrey report is here. It's a bit irritating, but I guess it's to be expected.
https://mycouncil.surreycc.gov.uk/documents/s71733/Cabinet Report PRLS - 27 Oct 20 - FINAL.pdf
The council ran a survey in which there was a 53% majority of Surrey residents in favour of continuation of the event.
This is rather inconvenient to their conclusions, so the report finds it necessary to downplay the survey with the caveat that the respondents were self selecting and not a representative sample. The subtext being that had it been a proper representative sample - a local survey for local people - then the results would have been quite different.
However, 41% of respondents strongly disagreed with continuation. These are
"strong concerns from many Surrey residents" including
"concerns over anti social behaviour of a small number of sports cyclists".
You can see where this is going ...
Many respondents also noted the long-term impacts of an increased number of cyclists using the route for practice or leisure all year round.
So it seems that a minority of respondents have raised concerns that they don't like cyclists on the road
at any time. And those are the ones they chose to give most credence to. The ones in favour of continuing were all self-selecting nobbers and therefore of less importance. Although they don't explain how they know that cancelling the event will necessarily bring about a reduction of year-round leisure cyclists.
I suppose it's not really surprising, given that we're only a stone's throw from the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead who brought the failed, legally flawed attempt to shut down the Velolife cafe, including threats of legal action against cycling clubs if they visited the cafe, threats which had to be hurriedly withdrawn before the whole thing fell to bits.
Personally I'm not that sad at the event's demise, but this report, with its logical inconsistencies, irrelevant points and general anti-cycling tone is rather irritating.