It really doesn't sit comfortable with me this 'has got to raise *insert amount here*'.
It should be 'try your best to raise as much as you can'
I agree, I could agree with you more, but I won't. I think it's a shame that folk are put under pressure to do this and to raise X amount, but it's what she wants to do, and she's doing cos she lost her dad to cancer 3 years ago, and my best friend died last April, completely riddled with the disease, from diagnosis to death was less than four months.
However, my personal opinion is that it don't sit right with me, and folk should be allowed to raise whatever they want for whom ever they want or non at all.
Another thing that is not making me comfortable is that many of the charities are offering small incentives to fund raise for them, for example, in the Ride London magazine, the Anthony Nolan charity are tempting us with "...training and equipment advice, personalised jersey, post race reception and a whole lot more..." surely these things cost money, and that money would be better spent on finding a cure for blood cancer not squandering it on hospitality. They're not the only ones either, join "Team Shelter" and instead of spending the hard earned donations on putting a roof over the heads of homeless, they'll give you an "...exclusive Shelter cycling jersey, a post race reception where you can relax, refuel and refresh, a dedicated event manager to keep you up to date with race news..."
The good thing about getting in the ballot is you can raise what you want for whom you want, or not bother. I have not yet decided wether or not I'm going to fundraise.