D
Deleted member 26715
Guest
Sorry a complete Whoooooooosh moment there, you're too clever for meIt was a joke on the homophones stationary/stationery. đź‘Ť
Sorry a complete Whoooooooosh moment there, you're too clever for meIt was a joke on the homophones stationary/stationery. đź‘Ť
Sorry a complete Whoooooooosh moment there, you're too clever for me
Outside the envelope?
The first time I ever did this, the driver threw his phone on the passenger seat. Then looked up at me and waved apology.
Last week was the first one in a long while (my commute is fairly rural, so long queues are not the norm); she didn't really seem to know what the issue was.
People vary. If they're acting like d1cks, it seems worth pointing it out, you never know the outcome.
If you're filtering up stationary traffic, is it okay to tap on the window to get the driver's attention, or would that constitute "assault"?
Not to report them, I mean - just to tell them to get off their phone.
I report these, I don't engage. The police deter people from engaging because you never know who you might be offending... the next Kenneth Noye is only a bit of "disrespect" away. I have no qualms reporting people using phones in "stationary" traffic because of the number of times I see them drive off without checking the road ahead properly. I also don't believe they'd be likely to pay proper attention to their driving if the messaging continues whilst they're in motion.
This is what happens when people think phone engagement is more important than driving.
https://road.cc/content/news/jail-distracted-driver-who-killed-cyclist-301907
You must do a hell of a lot of filtering in order to 'catch ' all these stationary mobile phone users, do you cruise up and down McDonald's drive thru or something?
As a matter of interest how does this 'policing ' of drivers work, I guess you have a camera mounted somewhere and you spot the target and somehow capture the reg and the act in a single sweep or do you need to stop and zoom in or something.
Or perhaps you look through your footage each day hoping for a result?
It's really not that uncommon.
You must just be far more observant than I
Me too, in my instance I'd rather look at where I'm going & what's likely to hit me than at drivers kneesWhen I'm cycling around town in the busy times I'm always looking out for my own safety.
You must do a hell of a lot of filtering in order to 'catch ' all these stationary mobile phone users, do you cruise up and down McDonald's drive thru or something?
As a matter of interest how does this 'policing ' of drivers work, I guess you have a camera mounted somewhere and you spot the target and somehow capture the reg and the act in a single sweep or do you need to stop and zoom in or something.
Or perhaps you look through your footage each day hoping for a result?
Me too, in my instance I'd rather look at where I'm going & what's likely to hit me than at drivers knees
Really not difficult to spot illegal mobile use, which together with speeding are probably the most common driving offences.
I would have though a single glance with a 'helmet-cam' would capture sufficient evidence of knuckle-dragger in action
I see, along with reg plate as well?
What happens then, get home and assess video evidence then upload date, time and location to the appropriate law enforcement agency?
All this whilst innocently riding to work?
You seem to be doubting this?
As well as, for some reason, being in favour of car drivers getting away with criminal and dangerous activity?
Seriously, why are you against these people being reported?