Cycleops
Legendary Member
- Location
- Accra, Ghana
And I thought that was a van you go camping in .That Mercedes has had a very nice conversion done, used to call them "sleepers".
And I thought that was a van you go camping in .That Mercedes has had a very nice conversion done, used to call them "sleepers".
Ugly? Not to all tastes, for sure. I rather like it.
About as much use as the Range Rover off road, I remember walking the 'Cat & Fiddle' in the late 80s and using the old road to drop into Buxton instead of the newer road (it was too steep to Tarmac so they built a longer but shallower gradient) About a mile or so down the track I was passed by 2 smartly dressed couples covered in black peat bog mud (one of the blokes was slightly less filthy than the others) about half a mile on was a Range Rover about 150yds off the 'road' (well more of a farm track by now) buried up to it's door sills in a peat bog. Ah I thought, no wonder they didn't respond to my cheery halloo as I'd passed them.Why bother with customised vehicles when BMW do the X6 (pointless) with low profile tyres (impractical)
View attachment 528788
Isn't that a Japanese collector that has quite a range of these road going ex-race cars?
Remind me how much VW loses on each one it produces, I remember Clarkson bandying about the figure of 5 million several years ago fine for a 'vanity' product I suppose but hardly a sound business venture. I don't remember it winning any races either, possibly because it doesn't fit into any racing classes.Ugly? Not to all tastes, for sure. I rather like it.
Pointless? Well, it's rather good at its intended function, being very, very, very fast indeed.
Impractical? To an extent. You'll have problems getting the weekly shop in it and fuel consumption struggles to get in single figures. Then there are the servicing costs.....
That said: it's a Volkswagen. This thing is not only very, very fast, you could (budget and tyre life permitting) drive it for many miles in all weathers. Apparently some owners do 12,000 miles a year in them.
The only problem: there's something more practical, and even faster. 987 bhp? Try 1600....oh, and 304 mph.
(Yes, this is more practical. The tyres are much cheaper than the Veyron's. And you don't have to keep replacing the wheels either. Not exactly cheap, but it's something).
View attachment 528800
Now, this is impractical.....and yes, it is road-legal, somehow......
View attachment 528801
Mr Moroi (the Japanese guy who owns the car featured on Topgear.com & which Rory Reid broke on telly) has a prototype of the Schuppan 962CR, built by former Porsche works driver Vern Schuppan. There were a few 962 conversions by various firms- apart from Dauer & Schuppan, Koenig Specials (they of 1000bhp Testarossa fame) did one as well. Moroi's car has race-replica bodywork, not the custom body the few production 962CRs have, plus a racing-spec engine taken from a 956....Isn't that a Japanese collector that has quite a range of these road going ex-race cars?
There was also the Dauer 962. The Porsche 962 race car converted for road use by Dauer and then converted back into a race car for Le Mans by Porsche!
They need quite a it of looking after too, something this owner forgot about.Ugly? Not to all tastes, for sure. I rather like it.
Pointless? Well, it's rather good at its intended function, being very, very, very fast indeed.
Impractical? To an extent. You'll have problems getting the weekly shop in it and fuel consumption struggles to get in single figures. Then there are the servicing costs.....
That said: it's a Volkswagen. This thing is not only very, very fast, you could (budget and tyre life permitting) drive it for many miles in all weathers. Apparently some owners do 12,000 miles a year in them.
The only problem: there's something more practical, and even faster. 987 bhp? Try 1600....oh, and 304 mph.
(Yes, this is more practical. The tyres are much cheaper than the Veyron's. And you don't have to keep replacing the wheels either. Not exactly cheap, but it's something).
View attachment 528800
Now, this is impractical.....and yes, it is road-legal, somehow......
View attachment 528801
Oh, not that old chestnut.....VW does not 'lose money' on Bugattis. Yes, it cost an awful lot of money to set up the Molsheim plant and develop the Veyron, but building businesses up from scratch generally does, let alone when you're building something that extreme. Porsche 'lost' money on the 959, McLaren 'lost' money on the F1…Ferrari made money, lots of it, on the F40, but sold about 1200 of them, and they were much cheaper to put together. VW is hardly Aston Martin or TVR, Noble, etc, either. The Chiron is turning a profit, VW will recoup its costs, eventually. Only another $1bn in sales on 500 cars, plus the limited edition stuff....Who said anything about racing? It was never intended for that…Remind me how much VW loses on each one it produces, I remember Clarkson bandying about the figure of 5 million several years ago fine for a 'vanity' product I suppose but hardly a sound business venture. I don't remember it winning any races either, possibly because it doesn't fit into any racing classes.
I wonder if air actually reached the spoiler at the back.A girlfriend had an Suzuki X-90 in the 1990's, it was slow, it had no space, even for two, it was no fun because it was pointlessly high and it was damn ugly, not cute or weird, just plain ugly. Can't remember when I last one. A really stupid car.
View attachment 528587