Phil Liggett and his mate

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

rich p

ridiculous old lush
Location
Brighton
Isn't s case that all commentators have to be " politicaly correct" nowadays otherwise their contract is not renewed. I am afraid it is the sad world we live in. All commentators are.controlled by their masters who decide their paycheque and their future.
I'm not sure what your point is. Do you mean that Ligget was forced into defending Armstrong despite all evidence to the contrary through contractual or "politicaly correct" obligations?
 

gavroche

Getting old but not past it
Location
North Wales
not so much to defend but more not to offend. Sitting on the fence is an easy option.
 

StuAff

Silencing his legs regularly
Location
Portsmouth
There are clear and unequivocal conflicts of interest in Liggett and Sherwen's links with Armstrong. They have both showed appalling judgement.
And, as Rich said, they're crap. Hugh Porter ain't perfect, but he's a lot better than the terrible twosome. Let alone Anthony McCrossan, to name but one. On one stage of the Tour last year, the first part of the ITV4 coverage had commentary by the studio bods. It was massively better. Then, unfortunately, the Phil and Paul show resumed.
 
Isn't part of the problem is that liggett and sherwen are actually employed by the outdoor network, a long term supporter of stretch Armstrong? Thus their commentary is v v US biased and they were always pro-US riders especially stretch? From what I remember ITV just buy their commentary.

And yes, I'd pay a premium to get bolting, boardman, imlach and rendell tag-teaming the commentary duties, they're all great.
 

kedab

Veteran
Location
nr cambridge
I can't bear listening to Alan Green on the radio.
I never liked Murray Walker on F1, but many thought him a god. They were wrong, of course. Hunt was sublime.

I just adore Stavros Parrish on MotoGP. Charlie Cox justs sounds like a funny Aussie cliche generator.

.

i too quite like parrish but cox...well that's just shot the fox who's having a nightmare in a bubble car :gun:
 

kedab

Veteran
Location
nr cambridge
i often think that i'd quite like to have a bash at the commentary though i fear that my tendency to use bad language at critical moments, may hinder my chances...my vocabulary isn't all that bad but years standing in the park lane at spurs does leave its mark :whistle:
 
I don't listen to any of them so can't comment, but just out of interest, have any of you tried to provide commentary? I have twice, once as co-commentator at a motorcycle race meeting and once during a cycling history parade at a major festival. It aint easy! And when you have an ear piece in with production staffl talking to you pretty much all the time - it's even harder!

This is more about Liggett having failed to toe RichP and Noodley's line on Armstrong than the quality of the commentary.
 

rich p

ridiculous old lush
Location
Brighton
This is more about Liggett having failed to toe RichP and Noodley's line on Armstrong than the quality of the commentary.
Another unnecessary and spiteful ad hominem.
You fail to notice that most of the posters on here dislike Ligget and Sherwen because they are poor commentators and have shown bias and ill judgement.
What line is it that Ligget didn't toe? Belief that Armstrong was a serial doper?
 
Another unnecessary and spiteful ad hominem.
You fail to notice that most of the posters on here dislike Ligget and Sherwen because they are poor commentators and have shown bias and ill judgement.
What line is it that Ligget didn't toe? Belief that Armstrong was a serial doper?
:laugh:
 

oldroadman

Veteran
Location
Ubique
A lot of the older generation of commentators started simply because they were the only people with enough knowledge to do the job when cycling made TV time in the past, and/or had contacts which helped them get the job. This genaration are now showing their afe a bit. For me David Harman is one of the best, I don't watch ITV4 coverage much so can't comment on L&S properly, though the little bits I have heard sound a bit dull, althogh PS does understand what is going on much like Sean Kelly on ES (but not quite so good). Not convinced by Mr McCrossan, find him a bit monotone, but Brian Smith is excellent at identifying riders, which is helpful to new viewers (and old ones as well!!).
It is a difficult job - imagine having a five hour stage where not much happens until the last hour or less - but even so a professional commentator is employed to keep the chat going and do their best with dull stimes. There are plenty of those in a long race. Constructive comment helps, just moaning about a few errors will achieve little, always thinking you don't know how good something was until it's not there!
 
Top Bottom