My question is should a cyclist modify their speed in the knowledge that there are plenty of phone zombies around who may step out onto the road?
Or should a cyclist ride at whatever speed they like (be that slow or fast) regardless?
And if it's agreed that maybe a cyclist should modify their speed in these circumstance is it not the case that failure to do so means the cyclist has some responsibility in any ensuing accident?
The ruling said 50/50% share of responsibility, he had 4 witnesses saying she was at fault, she had 1 witness, that it equates to 100k in costs if she is equally responsible?
People should cycle as per the situation sure, but he had the green light and she stepped into the road without looking, it's why we teach our children to look and listen
before stepping into the road.
This is why I gave my number to a driver recently, some dozy muppet ran into the road while he was turning right, she ran straight into the side of his car, he was stationary waiting for a gap in the traffic, she knocked her self onto the floor and was screaming at the driver that it was his fault, I can see a self entitled little snowflake like that seeing this story and attempt to sue the driver for her stupidity.