One should also judge a person on what they have done in their life. As a person of wealth he was not a normal celeb but one who give millions and did loads for charity to improve the lives of people who were no where near the same position he was in. He was traveling to an event for charity that day. A bad event and the world is lesser for it. He was known world wide which is why he made international news. The Glasgow event for example is more of a national example of news.
Not directly and I don't know how much directly as there are no figures but by using his status for charities to be able to raise such amounts at events and raise awareness to particular events in the world. Also by setting up the Reach Out Worldwide charity
Love knows no boundaries.
Jimmy Saville also raised millions for charity. Doesn't make him blameless in life does it? I believe in the early days of the revelations of his crimes his victims were villified in the press and referred to as gold diggers.
Apart from the last lass he had I cant see anything specifically unpleasant. One point I will make is Saville didn't put a ring on his victims. So that alone suggests different. Saville seemed more of a bash and dash sort of guy
You missed my point. Maybe I should put it more boldly next time.
Probably best not to, your foots already in your gob.
