Shut Up Legs
Down Under Member
... best done with fully-opaque cycling pants .
Yeah, but how was the bike?May be good for your buttocks but not good for your goolies when the chain snaps mid climb as I can testify!
(Half way up Birdlip Hill on the outskirts of Gloucester).
May be good for your buttocks but not good for your goolies when the chain snaps mid climb as I can testify!
(Half way up Birdlip Hill on the outskirts of Gloucester).
I'm confused.
Someone says its less efficient.
Someone says its not less efficient, and because they said NOT in capital letters, presumably in case we can't read, it looks jolly convincing.
What's a simple cycling bloke.to believe?
You can get up a 25% hill spinning a little gear in the saddle without getting exhausted
over 10 minutes, or you could get up it in a bigger gear in half the time but sweating like a pig.
The second option is better for building fitness though. It's called less efficient as you have to ride a bit harder. Basically bollox...
Ride hard ride fast. Ride slow, still be slow....
Indeed, use whatever method suits you .In or out the saddle just uses different muscle groups.
The tricky stuff starts with gradient increase and rider fitness.
It's that simple. Steep stuff requires much more effort. You can get up a 25% hill spinning a little gear in the saddle without getting exhausted over 10 minutes, or you could get up it in a bigger gear in half the time but sweating like a pig.
The second option is better for building fitness though. It's called less efficient as you have to ride a bit harder. Basically bollox...
Ride hard ride fast. Ride slow, still be slow....